We performed a comparison between Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] and Juniper WXC [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Juniper WXC [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization. Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Juniper WXC [EOL] is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] writes "Now we are able to inspect full SSL traffic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper WXC [EOL] writes "Compression, acceleration & mulit-path are valuable, however look at alternatives as the Juniper WXC is end-of-sale". Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Juniper WXC [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.