Our company uses the solution for site-to-site VPN tunnels.
We have more than 6,000 users and four administrators who monitor the solution.
Our company uses the solution for site-to-site VPN tunnels.
We have more than 6,000 users and four administrators who monitor the solution.
The solution includes a very stable VPN and IPS.
The solution's documentation is good.
The solution should include a commit button that allows for review of changes and deployments before they are submitted. Any actions are immediately reflected but it would be better if a review-before-commit option existed like with Palo Alto.
The solution could enhance its firewall reporting without the need for a sister product such as Analyzer.
I have been using the solution for four years.
The solution is very stable.
The solution is scalable and we intend to expand its use.
Technical support is very professional and helpful.
The initial setup is not complex.
A configuration takes about 30 minutes to restore and deploy.
Our company utilized the assistance of certified engineers provided by a reseller for implementation.
The solution requires an annual license but the cost is reasonable in comparison to competitors in the same category.
Our company has not yet explored other options, but plans to do so in the future.
Our company has been using the solution for four years and it is very stable and reliable.
We use the product to provide basic firewalling for IPsec and VM connections.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud has good pricing compared to other firewall and security products. It is not inexpensive but provides efficient performance. It has diverse tools, effective user experience, and web design.
They could support Linux clients. The Linux version currently lacks some of the latest features, notably in the IPv6 tool stack, which is available for Windows clients.
We have been using Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for four years. At present, we use the latest version.
I rate the stability an eight out of ten.
The platform needs to be more scalable in certain areas. This area needs improvement. I rate the scalability a six or seven out of ten.
The technical support team is helpful up to a certain level. The first level of support services needs improvement.
Neutral
We also use Juniper SSG as a firewall solution and Cisco for routing and switching.
Most of our customers prefer to deploy the solution on Azure. The deployment and maintenance team consists of around eight technical engineers responsible. The process requires coordination between operators and engineers, with expertise ranging from web sharing to troubleshooting. It takes ten to thirty minutes to complete.
Some client devices, especially proxy solutions, require additional agents for product installation.
All the consulting and deployment charges are included in the product's licenses. There are no additional costs.
I recommend Fortinet FortiGate Cloud to others and rate it an eight out of ten.
I work for a managed security service provider. We use this solution to deploy firewalls for our customers and then manage them on long-term contracts.
The most valuable feature of the solution is the remote management capability.
There is room for improvement in their management and downtime. They're constantly doing maintenance and there are unexpected downtimes for the cloud interface. It seems like they are having some growing pains.
I have been using this solution for a year and a half.
I have no negative impression of the FortiGate firewalls. Like I said, sometimes the cloud interface leaves a little to be desired in availability, but I don't want to exaggerate that. Of course you never want it to be down, but occasionally it is.
The scalability is great so far, although I don't think we have enough clients on the solution to really speak to that. We currently have a dozen firewalls on it, but we plan to roll it out to close to 100 customers.
I've used FortiGate's tech support one or two times, and they were outstanding and resolved my issues.
There is a learning curve, but on a scale of one to five, with one being almost impossible and five being extremely easy, I would rate the setup process as a three or four. We deploy new firewalls for our customers using this solution about once a month.
There are licensing costs for the firewall, of course, and there are licensing costs for all the add-on products, like the antivirus licenses and content builders. For us personally, as the managed service provider, there are licensing costs to manage the devices and logs in the cloud. That's a whole separate license.
I would rate this solution as an eight out of ten.
We are using Fortinet FortiGate Cloud as a firewall.
The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud are the IPS, SSL Wireless, and VPN. Additionally, packet inspection and point-to-point VPN application control are useful.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud could improve the dashboards.
I have been using Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for approximately two years.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is a stable solution for users.
We have approximately 225 users using this solution.
Whenever we faced problems our vendors who are supporting Fortinet FortiGate Cloud have raised a ticket on our behalf. We never needed to go to Fortinet because whatever problem we face, our team or our vendor, they were capable of handling it for us.
The initial installation is straightforward. The time it takes for the implementation depends if you start building from scratch or not. However, it takes a maximum of two hours using two people, this includes the configuration, OS upgrades, and FCL configuration.
We used managed services and had a partner implement the solution. We have one system engineer that does the maintenance and support of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud.
The price of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is reasonable when compared to Juniper and others, we are happy. We have a three-year subscription.
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Fortinet FortiGate Cloud a nine out of ten.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is easy to use.
The solution’s pricing and stability could be improved.
I have been using Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for three years.
I rate Fortinet FortiGate Cloud an eight out of ten for stability.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud's scalability is fine. Around 3,000 users use the solution in our organization.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud's technical support is fine.
We previously used Palo Alto and Sophos.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud's initial setup is not complex.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud can be deployed quickly. We implemented the solution through an in-house team.
We need to pay a yearly licensing fee for Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Fortinet FortiGate Cloud's pricing an eight out of ten.
I would recommend Fortinet FortiGate Cloud to other users.
Overall, I rate Fortinet FortiGate Cloud an eight out of ten.
We use Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for Fortinet VPN channeling and site-to-site VPN. We also use it to block some traffic.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud has security features, like DDoS protection and UTM. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is user-friendly. We can easily identify and use its features. So there won't be any difficulty in configuring, installing, or using it on a daily basis.
It would be much better if Fortinet FortiGate Cloud allowed third-party integrations like multi factor-authentication.
Better security features should be included in the next release.
I have been using Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for two to three years.
I rate Fortinet FortiGate Cloud an eight out of ten for scalability. Our organization provides FinTech services, and we use the solution daily.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is very easy to set up. The initial setup for Fortinet FortiGate Cloud takes around 10 to 15 minutes. I rate Fortinet FortiGate Cloud a nine out of ten for its initial setup.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is moderately priced. I rate Fortinet FortiGate Cloud a five out of ten for pricing.
Overall, I rate Fortinet FortiGate Cloud a nine out of ten.
We use the solution as a firewall.
The product is not recommended on the basis of technical parameters. It is very tough to authenticate.
I have been working with the solution for five years.
I would rate the product's stability a nine out of ten.
I would rate the tool's scalability a nine out of ten. My company has 1000 users for the product.
The tool's pricing is cheap.
I would rate the product a nine out of ten.
We use the solution for security purposes. We have an ISP. We connect the internet through the firewalls, and then we connect each firewall with the VPN to have on our network. We provide access for the students to the firewall.
It’s a good product overall. I have no problem with the service, with the defense, with management. All aspects of the product are pretty great.
It's user-friendly. I like the dashboard. I like the reports, and I like to download some data to help to analyze what's going on.
I don’t like the licensing. It’s grown too expensive, and we are considering leaving the service over as the price increases.
I would like to see Wi-Fi management inside the firewall.
I’ve used the solution for three years and other general Fortigate products for nine years.
The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn’t crash or freeze.
The product can scale as needed.
We have around 3,000 users on the solution.
Technical support is good. We receive support from the ISP.
The initial setup was kind of difficult. We didn't do it. The company, our ISP, installed them and configured them initially.
It took two days to deploy everything.
We handle the maintenance. We establish the policy, and then only if we find something to fix, do we change that. If not, we don't touch that. We have four people capable of maintenance activities, one engineer, and three specialists.
We had our ISP handle the implementation originally.
The way they set up the licensing could be better. I don’t like how it is right now. It’s expensive.
We pay around $19,000 a year and do not pay for extra technical support.
We are looking into something new currently. The decision is not technical at all. I know this equipment is great. I like it. However, the licenses went up in cost for no reason. It's the same model. We are analyzing the Firebox M-Box 349, pfSense, et cetera.
I’m an end-user.
I’m not using the latest version. I’m in the middle of deciding if we will continue to use the product or change it out for something new.
I recommend the solution. I have had a great experience. It's not difficult to learn. The reporting and dashboards are good. I have a model that is medium sized, the FG 300D. However, I reviewed the other models, and they looked great too. It’s really just the price for us.
I’d rate the solution nine out of ten.