Microsoft Virtual Server Reviews

We use Microsoft Virtual Server for its Hyper-V technology.

Virtual Server can assign RAM, CPU, and storage resources to virtual machines. This allows virtual machines to scale according to their needs.

There could be more security features included in the product.

We have been using Microsoft Virtual Server for eight years. We use version 2019 at present.

We have 1000 Microsoft Virtual Server users in our organization. We use it once a week. I rate its scalability a seven out of ten.

We use the solution for internal business purposes. 

The solution is stable. 

Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its stability. 

I rate the product's stability an eight out of ten. 

The tool is scalable. 

Microsoft Virtual Server's deployment can be done in-house. 

Some of the licensing costs are monthly, and others are yearly. 

I rate Microsoft Virtual Server an eight out of ten. 

You can use Microsoft Virtual Server as an emulator. You can also set it up over different operating systems or use it as a sandbox to test applications.

Based on my use case, I find Microsoft Virtual Server to be useful for Android development.

As certain medium-level complexities are involved in the product's setup process, the product's setup phase can be considered for improvement.

In the future releases of the solution, I want the solution to be a more user-friendly UI.

I have been using Microsoft Virtual Server for two weeks.

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten since I am not very familiar with the solution presently.

It is a scalable solution.

I followed some online tutorials, because of which I did not face any technical issues or the need to contact the solution's technical support.

Since the initial setup of the product is neither easy nor difficult, I would describe the setup phase to be of an intermediate level.

The solution's deployment process took me an hour to complete.

The solution is deployed on a local system and not on the cloud.

I managed the solution's deployment process.

There is no need for me to pay anything towards the solution's licensing costs.

I recommend the solution to those who plan to use it. Initially, one should only follow the basic steps provided by the solution.

I rate the overall product an eight to nine out of ten.

I just use the solution for installation and configuration.

The solution's performance is good.

It would be good if the tool's integration improved.

I use Microsoft Virtual Server from time to time.

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

The initial setup is easy. If you deploy the solution on the cloud, there is not much work to do. If you deploy it on-premises, you have to maintain it 24/7. The solution takes about ten minutes to deploy, but the time taken depends.

I set up the solution myself, though we sometimes need one to ten people to deploy and maintain the solution, depending on the environment.

The solution is deployed on the cloud but can also be on-premise. I rate Microsoft Virtual Server a ten out of ten and recommend the solution to others.

We are a bookmaking firm. The solution is quite good for collaboration across multiple teams.

The product is reliable.

The product must provide better data analytics.

I have been using the solution for 15 years.

The tool is stable and accessible. It’s a robust and reliable solution.

The tool is scalable. We have 15 users. We use it every minute of the day.

The initial setup is simple. It is a cloud solution. Our operating system is server-based. To deploy the tool, we spoke to our software provider and linked up with a company that offers hosting services to deploy it on the cloud.

A third-party vendor helped us implement the solution. They also help us with maintenance and support.

The product’s reliability and accessibility are valuable to us.

I will recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We use Microsoft Virtual Server to monitor user behavior on virtual machines. We can view incident reports using it.

The product helps us secure VMs from vulnerabilities in our systems like Sentinel. It indicates the threat via email notification. We are then able to resolve the issues as soon as possible.

The platform could provide more integration and stability.

It is a stable product.

We have 25 Microsoft Virtual Server users in our organization. We might increase the number of users to 40 in the current year, 2023. It is a scalable product.

I initially contacted Microsoft Virtual Server’s support team as we were in a learning phase. They were very cooperative and provided support on time.

I have worked with AWS services in virtual environments. It is very costly, and technical support services are difficult to find compared to Microsoft Virtual Server in our region. At the same time, Microsoft provides technical support on email and calls according to requirements.

The initial setup process is complicated compared to open-source solutions like Linux, which also provides a secure environment. We deploy the product on-premise and on the cloud.

I recommend Microsoft Virtual Server an eight out of ten.

In my organization, we have three physical servers running Windows Server 2015. We are also using Hyper-V to create virtual servers on these physical servers. We currently have seven virtual servers running on these three physical servers. These virtual servers are running properly and we have not had any issues with them. One of the advantages of using virtual servers is that we can back up a VM and restore it to any physical server in one to two hours.

Microsoft Virtual Server is stable. There is no issue there. Our customers are running two virtual terminal servers, one ERP server, and one antivirus server. All four servers are running properly, and a maximum of 60 users can log in.

The solution should be more user-friendly and cheaper. It will be charged through databases, which means that when I use the server, I will be charged, but when I don't use the server, I won't be charged. To use a physical server, you need to purchase one at a certain price. After three years, you need to purchase AMC for the server which is a recurring cost. Additionally, there are electricity and maintenance costs. Virtual servers in the cloud can be cheaper than physical servers, especially if the monthly cost is lower. Therefore, many clients and organizations will choose to use virtual servers.

I have been using Microsoft Virtual Server for ten years.

The product is stable.

The product is not scalable. We have 60 primary users using this solution. Upon migration, it will be 100.

The initial setup is easy. To require a certain specification of the server, we need to clear the cloud first. We need at least a six-core server for our backup process. A Cisco server with 48GB of primary storage and two 1TB SSDs is sufficient for our needs for ERP. After six months, if the end of support is reached, we will move to our turn server and use the data server. The first step will be server migration, then it will be the terminal server migration.

The solution has a yearly license. If we switch to a yearly subscription plan for Microsoft Virtual Server, it would be cheaper in the long run. The price per month would be higher, but the overall cost for the year would be lower.

We want to move our ERP server to the cloud. We need to prepare our users and the ERP system itself, as well as develop a digital plan. We have two partners that we need to collaborate with, and we need to discuss the move with them. We believe that we can complete the migration within this year, and we plan to be fully operational in the cloud by January 2024. Around four technical staff is enough for maintenance. If a client is having a problem, they need to be able to contact the vendor (the end user) in order to provide support. Microsoft should have a portal or make it easy for customers to contact them if they are having any technical issues or addressing problems. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I use the tool to reset servers. 

The most valuable feature is the tool's cheap cost. 

Microsoft Virtual Server should improve its network performance. 

I have been using the product for more than ten years. 

Microsoft Virtual Server is stable. 

We did the deployment in-house. 

I rate Microsoft Virtual Server a seven out of ten.