NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM) Reviews

Users reported that the Return on Investment (ROI) from NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM) was significant. They highlighted that the tool's comprehensive vulnerability identification helped reduce potential risks and presented cost savings by preventing security breaches. The ASM's proactive risk mitigation and the ability to streamline security processes were mentioned as key contributors to enhancing the overall value, making it a beneficial investment for organizations.

Users have a generally positive impression of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM). They find the costs to be competitive and reasonable for the value provided. The setup process is often described as straightforward and not overly complex, which is appreciated by those implementing the solution. Licensing is viewed as flexible and accommodating to different organizational needs. Overall, people are satisfied with the financial and implementation aspects of NetSPI ASM.

Users primarily utilize NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM) to identify vulnerabilities and manage their security postures effectively. The solution is frequently employed to continuously monitor and assess potential security threats, providing organizations with crucial insights to bolster their defenses. Additionally, it is used to automate security testing processes, ensuring that the network and applications remain protected against emerging threats. Another significant use is in compliance management, allowing organizations to meet regulatory standards and avoid potential penalties.

Customers have expressed a high level of satisfaction with the customer service and support provided by NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM). Users frequently highlight the knowledgeable and responsive support team, noting their prompt and effective assistance with any issues or questions. The overall sentiment indicates that the support team is both approachable and capable, contributing to a positive experience with the product.

Users indicate that NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM) requires a longer duration for complete deployment and setup compared to other solutions. Context shows NetSPI involves more complex processes, suggesting a steeper learning curve or higher customization needs.

Users generally find the scalability of NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM) satisfactory. Some highlight its ability to handle the expansive needs of larger organizations efficiently. However, a few users note areas for improvement, such as performance when scaling up substantially. Overall, opinions reflect a mix of positive feedback for its competencies and moderate feedback suggesting enhancements to support very large-scale deployments.

Users have consistently noted that NetSPI Attack Surface Management stands out for its robust performance. They commend its reliability, highlighting that it operates smoothly without frequent disruptions. Additionally, users appreciate the platform's consistent and dependable performance, contributing to an overall positive experience.