The solution pricing varies by service region is mid-range. Various conditions determine pricing such as the IP selected. I rate pricing a six out of ten.
Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is not licensed-based. It's server-based. When we want to use more services, we need to pay more. It's a monthly subscription, rather than licensed-based. Pricing or fees for this service could be improved.
I have not explored the price of the solution extensively, but from what I have seen the price is alright. There is an annual subscription needed for the solution.
Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling helps you maintain application availability and allows you to automatically add or remove EC2 instances according to conditions you define. ... Dynamic scaling responds to changing demand and predictive scaling automatically schedules the right number of EC2 instances based on predicted demand.
The solution is not expensive.
The product's pricing depends on the traffic and workload. Additional costs exist if you use services like CloudWatch, VPN, etc.
It's not expensive, nor too cheap; it's okay. We can compare it to the pricing of other cloud service providers.
The solution is less expensive than Azure and GCP.
The solution's price is affordable for enterprise customers.
The product is cheap.
The pricing model is usage-based.
The licences for this solution are based on the number of instances. This determines the EC2 type that is used and this is then priced accordingly.
Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling uses a pay-as-you-go pricing model. I rate the price of Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling a nine out of ten.
The solution pricing varies by service region is mid-range. Various conditions determine pricing such as the IP selected. I rate pricing a six out of ten.
The license is pay as you use.
There are no licensing costs. However, there is a monthly service charge.
Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is not licensed-based. It's server-based. When we want to use more services, we need to pay more. It's a monthly subscription, rather than licensed-based. Pricing or fees for this service could be improved.
I have not explored the price of the solution extensively, but from what I have seen the price is alright. There is an annual subscription needed for the solution.
Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.
The price of this product could be a little bit lower.
The pricing is not fixed and it is based on usage.
Pricing could be a little bit more competitive.