Division Manager, Information Technology at Lonestar
Real User
Top 5
2024-04-01T09:06:03Z
Apr 1, 2024
The licensing part of the product is too expensive compared to other solutions in the market. There are other competitors of CylancePROTECT in the market who have been keeping the prices of their products low. If you plan to go with CylancePROTECT, CylanceOptics, and EDR, then it can be expensive. There were no additional costs attached to the solution apart from the standard licensing charges apart from charges that my company had to pay to the integrators from AMC, which is a very small amount. In general, it is a license subscription model that requires users to make annual payments.
Currently, we have competitive pricing for Cylance, which is affordable enough to consider. However, similar pricing can also be obtained from vendors like CrowdStrike and SentinelOne due to the competitive nature of the market. Moreover, with many traditional antivirus solutions now branding themselves as EDR, pricing alone may not be the deciding factor. It often boils down to negotiating discounts aggressively. So, pricing is just one aspect of a complex decision-making process.
Senior Technical Support Analyst at Paul's Transport Inc
Real User
Top 5
2023-07-19T17:15:45Z
Jul 19, 2023
I pay for an initial amount of licenses. I tell the solution providers if I need more or fewer licenses next year, and they charge me accordingly. If I pay for fifty licenses and end up having a hundred, I have to just pay for it through my next renewal. It's very easy. The solution provides me with competitive pricing. I was a long-term customer and was grandfathered in.
Solutions Development Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-01-27T15:52:39Z
Jan 27, 2022
The license price for this solution could be better. It's on the expensive side. We're on a yearly license for this solution. I'm not sure, but I believe there isn't any extra cost, apart from the license fee.
I don't have any information in relation to the pricing or the licensing. it's not an aspect of the solution I deal with. However, I can say that it's my understanding that it is 20% less expensive than SentinelOne.
We paid according to the number of endpoints that we have and it was approximately the same that we were paying for McAfee. The monthly fee is $55 USD per user.
Blackberry Protect is a next generation artificial intelligence (AI) based endpoint protection platform (EPP) that prevents breaches and provides added controls for safeguarding against sophisticated cyberthreats. It uses predictive analysis to quickly and accurately find even the most advanced threats before they ever take place. Blackberry Protect’s cloud-based supercomputer mines hundreds of millions of files from all over the cloud, allowing it to predict and stop any hacker dead in...
The licensing part of the product is too expensive compared to other solutions in the market. There are other competitors of CylancePROTECT in the market who have been keeping the prices of their products low. If you plan to go with CylancePROTECT, CylanceOptics, and EDR, then it can be expensive. There were no additional costs attached to the solution apart from the standard licensing charges apart from charges that my company had to pay to the integrators from AMC, which is a very small amount. In general, it is a license subscription model that requires users to make annual payments.
On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.
Currently, we have competitive pricing for Cylance, which is affordable enough to consider. However, similar pricing can also be obtained from vendors like CrowdStrike and SentinelOne due to the competitive nature of the market. Moreover, with many traditional antivirus solutions now branding themselves as EDR, pricing alone may not be the deciding factor. It often boils down to negotiating discounts aggressively. So, pricing is just one aspect of a complex decision-making process.
CylancePROTECT is an affordable solution. On average, it costs around $ 60 per device per annum.
I pay for an initial amount of licenses. I tell the solution providers if I need more or fewer licenses next year, and they charge me accordingly. If I pay for fifty licenses and end up having a hundred, I have to just pay for it through my next renewal. It's very easy. The solution provides me with competitive pricing. I was a long-term customer and was grandfathered in.
The solution is expensive.
My company is on a yearly CylancePROTECT subscription. Price-wise, the solution is slightly expensive, so I'd rate it as eight out of ten.
The pricing is not reasonable. I'm not sure of the exact number. However, we'd prefer if we paid less.
CylancePROTECT's pricing is reasonable, at about €18 per user, per year.
The license price for this solution could be better. It's on the expensive side. We're on a yearly license for this solution. I'm not sure, but I believe there isn't any extra cost, apart from the license fee.
We pay our license on a yearly basis and have just renewed for two years.
It's not so heavily priced; rather, it's average and decent.
I don't have any information in relation to the pricing or the licensing. it's not an aspect of the solution I deal with. However, I can say that it's my understanding that it is 20% less expensive than SentinelOne.
We currently pay an annual license fee although I'd prefer we were paying on a monthly basis.
This cost of the license is approximately $5 USD monthly per user.
I believe the product cost is about $5, per user, per month.
We paid according to the number of endpoints that we have and it was approximately the same that we were paying for McAfee. The monthly fee is $55 USD per user.
I think that the price we are paying is good for what it is. It could always be cheaper, but cheaper doesn't make it better.
We would just add more if there are new users, but right now you just need one license for per user.