Network Administrator at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
User
Top 5
2022-12-05T15:10:00Z
Dec 5, 2022
The setup is easy. However if first implemented, it's a good idea to add a "clean up" rule at the bottom rather than denying. This will allow the traffic and you can further tweak rules without impacting users.
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Application Control. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2024.
It is very important before implementing security improvements to have a test environment to evaluate correctly. I recommend taking previous implementations into account.
Technology consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2021-03-19T08:58:00Z
Mar 19, 2021
I think application control has become a basic feature and it should be enabled automatically, without having to purchase a separate license for it. Alternatively, it should be available at a minimal cost.
Network Security Engineer/Architect at Euronext Technologies SAS
Real User
Top 5
2020-10-04T06:40:00Z
Oct 4, 2020
Pricing is in line with the competition. Licensing is not complicated. The license application is straightforward and it functions well. There are no additional costs that I'm aware of.
Choosing the correct set of the licenses is essential - without the additional software blade licenses purchased the Check Point gateways are just stateful firewall.
Check Point Application Control provides the industry’s strongest application security and identity control to organizations of all sizes. It enables IT teams to easily create granular policies, based on users or groups, to identify, block or limit usage of thousands of Web applications and widgets.Learn more about Application control software
The product is expensive but it is worth the money.
You must evaluate the needs that the company requires, then request quotes according to the needs of different suppliers.
The cost and licensing terms have been reliable.
The setup cost and licensing terms are efficient.
The setup is easy. However if first implemented, it's a good idea to add a "clean up" rule at the bottom rather than denying. This will allow the traffic and you can further tweak rules without impacting users.
The cost is good and flexible for any organization.
Their cost is based on their appliances, and they offer equipment with the highest licensing.
The pricing has to be more economical.
It is very important before implementing security improvements to have a test environment to evaluate correctly. I recommend taking previous implementations into account.
The price is in line with the competition. They maintain an accessible and competitive price.
Licenses are expensive, but it is a good option for everything it delivers.
We do need to pay a yearly subscription in order to access the product.
Despite the somewhat high cost, based on the blades, it is a reliable solution.
The setup is very straightforward and the licensing works based on a subscription model.
The licensing is very good. We always rely on an authorized dealer to ensure proper operation and sizing.
The blade has its cost but you can take advantage of the license package to pay less for it.
I think application control has become a basic feature and it should be enabled automatically, without having to purchase a separate license for it. Alternatively, it should be available at a minimal cost.
Pricing is in line with the competition. Licensing is not complicated. The license application is straightforward and it functions well. There are no additional costs that I'm aware of.
Choosing the correct set of the licenses is essential - without the additional software blade licenses purchased the Check Point gateways are just stateful firewall.
It's a bit expensive and it could be cheaper, but it's part of business politics.