We performed a comparison between Acunetix and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment."
"I haven't seen reporting of that level in any other tool."
"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"The usability and overall scan results are good."
"It's very user-friendly for the testing teams. It's very easy for them to understand things and to fix vulnerabilities."
"Acunetix has an awesome crawler. It gives a referral site map of near targets and also goes really deep to find all the inputs without issues. This was valuable because it helped me find some files or directories, like web admin panels without authentication, which were hidden."
"One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that."
"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."
"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is an easy-to-use product. I"
"The solution provides seamlessness, a perfect UI, and identity management for office operations. We are most vulnerable to users. Therefore, it is crucial to implement the right solution to ensure proper user access and resource management."
"The best feature of the solution is the amount of visibility it provides of the vulnerabilities."
"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."
"The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status."
"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."
"You can customize each point in new scans."
"While we do have it integrated with other solutions, it could still offer more integrations."
"Acunetix needs to be dynamic with JavaScript code, unlike Netsparker which can scan complex agents."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the way the licensing model is currently is not very convenient for us because initially, when we bought it, the licensing model was very flexible, but now it restricts us."
"There's a clear need for a reduction in pricing to make the service more accessible."
"Currently only supports web scanning."
"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."
"The only problem that they have is the price. It is a bit expensive, and you cannot change the number of applications for the whole year."
"Acunetix needs to improve its cost."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"More flexibility is required compared to other solutions."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
"The product could be easier to set up on the cloud."
"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."
"I would like the solution to cover the whole cycle of mitigation since it's an area where the solution currently lacks."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Acunetix is ranked 15th in Vulnerability Management with 26 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Acunetix is rated 7.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Acunetix writes "Fantastic reporting features hindered by slow scanning ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Acunetix is most compared with OWASP Zap, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, HCL AppScan and Fortify WebInspect, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
