We performed a comparison between Apache Subversion and Bitbucket based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."
"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."
"Bitbucket has a pull request-based method, similar to Git's merge request feature."
"Bitbucket is feasible and friendly compared to Visual Studio DevOps on the Microsoft platform."
"The tool's automation helped because we onboarded a lot of projects and teams into Bitbucket. The product's automation helped us complete activities in two days which previously used to take around two weeks to complete. We have completely automated processes that were earlier manual. It has good integration with Jira and Jenkins."
"Bitbucket is significantly cheaper compared to GitHub and it provides on-premises hosting."
"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."
"We have approximately 300 to 400 users using this solution. Our whole organization uses it. I rate the scalability of Bitbucket an eight out of ten."
"The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it is has been a good experience from my side using this solution."
"Bitbucket works, and it's reliable"
"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is CLI."
"I rate Bitbucket five out of 10 for affordability. It isn't cheap."
"I think the configuration can be improved because it is getting more complicated and not very well organized."
"The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions."
"The tool offers a limited pipeline structure."
"Bitbucket doesn't currently offer AI functionalities."
"I would like to see the tool's desktop version."
"The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved."
"Bitbucket's stability isn't flawless. It has crashed on me occasionally, but I haven't yet lost anything after a crash."
Apache Subversion is ranked 9th in Version Control with 4 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. Apache Subversion is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Subversion writes "Centralized repository, but the stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". Apache Subversion is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and IBM Rational ClearCase. See our Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.