We performed a comparison between Apigee and ReadyAPI Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup was easy - there was an onboarding document with steps that we followed."
"The features I found most valuable are how the APIs are published, the whole process of finalizing the API, and then controlling it."
"Apigee is a strong-featured solution. It leads in Gartner Quadrant ratings and it is a full-slated API solution that has the features that an API gateway requires."
"There are just a lot of security features in general."
"The stability of the solution is good. There aren't issues surrounding bugs or glitches. We don't find that it crashes or freezes. It's pretty reliable."
"Its customer service is good."
"The following features are most valuable: API Management, Analytics, Quota, and the Developer Portal."
"The security that you have with Apigee is very good and aligns with compliance."
"SoapUI Pro is a good tool when it comes to API design and orchestration. Additionally, it is beneficial for functional and for performance testing."
"The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on."
"One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful."
"It's a very simple solution to use."
"ReadyAPI has the power to enrich all the technical work. You can achieve any complex task using ReadyAPI. I can also do UI automation with ReadyAPI. In a few test cases, we want to check the API and the equivalent UI. I download a job and write a piece of Groovy or Java code. It's almost the same in ReadyAPI. I can do that in a single test case. ReadyAPI is a powerful tool because you can do anything you want, but only you need to download the right set of jobs and produce the right set of code."
"The Pro and free version of SoapUI Pro has good technical support."
"The solution has some good scanning features."
"The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature."
"More documentation on the Open Banking Standard will help."
"I would like to see SOAP services and socket-based connectivity developed."
"The initial setup for the on-prem solution is a little complex."
"Integration should be improved."
"When it comes to the rate limit, we don't have a specific category for rate limits for a particular customer."
"As it is now, the rotation of certificates is a manual task and is something that can be improved."
"They have an external developer platform that was a little bit painful."
"We've encountered challenges in leveraging Connect functionality, prompting us to explore additional tools, such as Fergus, to address implementation and security issues."
"If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating."
"I would like more documentation, training, tutorials, etc. Also, I don't particularly appreciate that I have to save everything. It takes up a lot of space on my laptop, but I have to install the WSDL again If I don't save it."
"We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs."
"The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user."
"There aren't any plugins for UI automation. You need to make a custom code and download a job to put into the libraries. If it were panelized, then it would be straightforward. It should be in a panel of the tools, so you can add those tools as your test step in your test cases."
"SoapUI would benefit from some more customization abilities. It's a good interface, but it would be nice if they added the ability to build custom dashboards where the user can do their own bar graphs and pie charts."
"Could integrate the graphing module for load testing."
"I find that I'm fighting with the opportunities to order requests."
Apigee is ranked 6th in API Testing Tools with 82 reviews while ReadyAPI Test is ranked 8th in API Testing Tools with 31 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while ReadyAPI Test is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI Test writes "You can achieve any complex task with this tool". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, Amazon API Gateway, WSO2 API Manager and Layer7 API Management, whereas ReadyAPI Test is most compared with Postman, Broadcom Service Virtualization, ReadyAPI and Tricentis Tosca. See our Apigee vs. ReadyAPI Test report.
See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
