We performed a comparison between ReadyAPI Test and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has some good scanning features."
"SoapUI is uncomplicated and user-friendly."
"Using SoapUI's automation suites to run all our test cases saved us a lot of time. Running 300 test cases takes about three to four days. When you automate all that, it takes only two to three hours."
"The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on."
"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others."
"The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"The tool’s scalability is very good."
"Software testing tool that has multiple features. It's good to use for SAP testing, and it helps reduce test execution time."
"We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis."
"I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have enterprise-level customers."
"The most valuable features of Tricentis Tosca are all the test automation functionality. It is a full-scale automation tool."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"I face no challenges or stability issues."
"As a codeless automation tool, the product offers a user-friendly experience without requiring extensive coding knowledge. Users can easily handle various applications, including web applications, SAP applications, Windows applications, and even Salesforce applications, without manual coding."
"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."
"Automation features are not user-friendly."
"The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user."
"SoapUI Pro is a little heavy due to the number of features. Previously it was not that heavy. Now the tool is too heavy, they should work on fixing this issue because until your system has lots of resources, you won't be able to use it seamlessly. The performance of the application itself could improve."
"Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."
"There are no bugs or glitches, but a few features available only in the Pro version could be made available in the open-source version. Some of the features do not necessarily need to be only available to Pro users. The data generator would be really useful for the open-source version users."
"The UI could be a bit more flexible."
"It is limited to scope and risk services only. It does have some support for JMS, but it is not out-of-the-box; you have to do some tweaks here and there."
"I find that I'm fighting with the opportunities to order requests."
"In Tosca, I see that there are no user guides."
"Tricentis Tosca's performance could be better. Sometimes when we are remapping or when it is loading it can take a lot of time. There are free solutions that have better performance in this area."
"One thing to improve in Tricentis Tosca is that it's not compatible with Excel based forms. Another area for improvement is that the tool is not compatible with OpenText applications. The support and licensing cost for it also need improvement. The tool also needs cloud support, as it's currently on-premises only."
"ScratchBook execution needs to be improved as Tosca crashes multiple times."
"Parallel execution is not yet implemented for Tosca. This means you can't execute the same test case on multiple machines remotely."
"A disadvantage of Tricentis Tosca is that you have to customize it according to your need, during the early stages of the software, particularly during upstream testing, before system and unit testing."
"Might have a learning curve, as it does not follow the traditional Record-Play functionality, but tests have to be built from requirements or Agile story cards."
"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."
ReadyAPI Test is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 31 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 98 reviews. ReadyAPI Test is rated 8.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ReadyAPI Test writes "You can achieve any complex task with this tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". ReadyAPI Test is most compared with Postman, Broadcom Service Virtualization, ReadyAPI and Apigee, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim. See our ReadyAPI Test vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best API Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
