We performed a comparison between ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) and Snare based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Customization. ArcSight gives you a platform to on-board out-of-the-box devices with a more accurate way of collecting desired logs/events."
"I value the event correlation of this product."
"Once the rules are defined, it becomes easy to detect changes and generate automated logs."
"The most valuable features of ArcSight ESM are ease of use and readily usable components."
"I really like the correlation part and the way the logs are correlated. I have never faced issues with parsing in this product. I like the way it parses, and everything is so clear to me."
"There are many features that are good for clients who are looking for a good SIEM solution. They like the ease of creating a business that is effective and impressive."
"The product is quite mature. It's been around for a long time."
"The filters and the ability to do what you want are the most valuable features. There is nothing that you cannot do in this solution. It has all the features, which makes it very dynamic."
"The best thing about Snare is its format and consistency."
"Snare has good agents, especially for Windows."
"The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have security value."
"The onboarding process for this solution could be better. It also needs a better GUI."
"The API integration could be better, and I'd like to see more machine-learning capabilities in the future."
"I would like to have a feature that gives us an entire report listing what devices are integrated."
"We would like the ability to easily identify either unused resources or those that are being used sub-optimally."
"The dashboard looks a bit cumbersome."
"The stability isn't quite perfect. We occasionally run into problems."
"The UI interface is somewhat complex and needs to be simplified."
"The solution could be more stable."
"Snare should modernize its GUI a little bit."
"Users will initially find it difficult to identify the event types and installation in Snare."
"The solution is now developing a SIEM-like feature on Snare Central Server, but it's not complete yet."
More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is ranked 12th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 93 reviews while Snare is ranked 37th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 3 reviews. ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is rated 7.8, while Snare is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) writes "Allows for monitoring logs according to industry standards within ESM but has a total capacity capped at 12 TB, limiting real-time data retention periods". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snare writes "A highly scalable solution that is easy to manage and super easy to set up". ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, ArcSight Intelligence, Trellix ESM, IBM Security QRadar and Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response, whereas Snare is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, syslog-ng, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security. See our ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Snare report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.