We performed a comparison between Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization and Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization."The platform’s features for latency mitigation help optimize user experience."
"The solution includes features for SD-WAN and WAN such as batch conditioning and optimization."
"The file and data reduction capabilities are very good. Without it, we have a great deal of network congestion."
"The tool is easy to configure due to the existing pre-configured templates. It is easy to manage compared to legacy systems, which takes time. We can complete a site within 30 minutes. The tool's best feature is outdoor onboarding. You need to bring the box to the site with the internet. It is a simple plug-and-play. The solution offers a zero-touch procedure."
"The most valuable features of Silver Peak VX are we can register our customers and they can receive free training and all the solutions features."
"The most valuable feature of Silver Peak VX is the overall performance."
"I really love the auto-tunnel creation feature."
"Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect has high availability."
"The most valuable feature of Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect is the boost."
"Currently, we encounter challenges in terms of the functioning of compression, deduplication, and other features even after uploading the certificate for encrypted traffic."
"Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform’s stability and technical features need improvement."
"More technical sessions should be offered for deploying the solution."
"They have to implement more security with it. The security, mainly their firewall functions, have to be included in the firewall features."
"In future releases, I would like to see security features, so Aruba might need some firewalls, like other vendors."
"The license features should improve in the solution. For example, when you purchase VMware, it starts at a low level that has some functionality. When you want to expand, the difference in the price is substantial. I purchased the lower functional version for $4,000, and now if I want to upgrade, they ask me for $80,000. This is a $76,000 difference, there's no logic, but this is VMware."
"The support from Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect has declined since Aruba acquired them. The knowledge and speed of the agents could improve."
"There are some functional limitations that could improve."
"This solution is suitable for small to medium-sized companies. If we have large-sized companies it is better to use Cisco or Palo Alto."
More Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is ranked 12th in WAN Optimization with 1 review while Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is ranked 1st in WAN Optimization with 19 reviews. Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is rated 0.0, while Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization writes "Easy-to-deploy with valuable features for web optimization ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform writes "Flexible, efficient, and responsive support". Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is most compared with , whereas Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, VMware SD-WAN, Prisma SD-WAN and Cato SASE Cloud Platform.
See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.