We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and Portnox Clear based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Aruba ClearPass is its ease of use and the GUI is user-friendly."
"What I like most about Aruba ClearPass is its access tracker that serves as its monitoring feature. The access tracker is really helpful when you want to troubleshoot authentication failures."
"ClearPass' best features are authentication, support for multiple devices, and monitoring."
"The support is top notch, expert, and very friendly. "
"It eliminated the management of 10 different individual discrete RADIUS servers."
"I like the stability and the GUI, which is always improving."
"The most valuable features of Aruba ClearPass are its ease of use and the general network access controls."
"Aruba is a highly scalable product. It just works. We have no issues with scalability."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."
"The solution has a valuable reporting feature."
"The pricing policy could be more flexible."
"The setup of ClearPass can be a bit convoluted at times."
"The interface could be made easier and more intuitive."
"Lacks the ability to handle more than one certificate for both the management process and the Captive Portal."
"Configuration should be more easy to understand between the link of two topics."
"The solution should be more precise for VMs and allow for management of the entire system."
"Instructions on adding layouts are not as clear as they could be."
"We have had some issues with the installation of Aruba ClearPass."
"From a resource perspective, the OEM can do better in terms of resource utilization."
"As there are no agents in Portnox Clear, the customers of the product cannot download any agents on their devices, making them unsure if the product offers proper security."
"I believe there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of integration."
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 75 reviews while Portnox Clear is ranked 12th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while Portnox Clear is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox Clear writes "An affordable tool to monitor routers and access points". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and Microsoft Intune, whereas Portnox Clear is most compared with Portnox CORE. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. Portnox Clear report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.