We performed a comparison between Portnox Clear and Portnox CORE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The solution has a valuable reporting feature."
"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."
"Technical support was very helpful when we needed them."
"I am impressed with the solution's voucher capability and authentication. The tool is integrated with Active Direct storage."
"The product is a valuable solution within zero-trust architecture, enhancing network security and visibility."
"It's a stable product."
"The minute people have issues on their network, we can see what is happening right away."
"It's so easy to set up, you don't need outside assistance."
"The technical support is top-notch."
"For the information security team, the security level was improved because it helped to manage and prevent rogue devices from connecting to the corporate network. The reporting was granular, and reports we scheduled for delivery on Portnox were useful during investigations and audits, especially in cases where the IP address changed."
"As there are no agents in Portnox Clear, the customers of the product cannot download any agents on their devices, making them unsure if the product offers proper security."
"I believe there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of integration."
"From a resource perspective, the OEM can do better in terms of resource utilization."
"One of the things for the on-premise is that sometimes you click on it and it takes a while for it to respond."
"We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE."
"The price could be better."
"Portnox CORE can improve on support for unmanaged switches (or hubs) and other brands of network devices. These kinds of devices are still in use in organisations, especially SMEs who cannot afford to buy a managed switch."
"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."
"It might be beneficial to improve the ease of integrating the product with firewalls."
"The product should consider more integration with vendors like Huawei. It should also improve visibility. The solution should offer a partner portal that can provide customers training on the in and out of the solution."
"It could be a little cheaper."
Portnox Clear is ranked 12th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews while Portnox CORE is ranked 11th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 14 reviews. Portnox Clear is rated 7.6, while Portnox CORE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Portnox Clear writes "An affordable tool to monitor routers and access points". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Simple UI, easy deployment but slow authentication times for devices". Portnox Clear is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, whereas Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform and Sophos Network Access Control. See our Portnox CORE vs. Portnox Clear report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.