We performed a comparison between Automic Automation Intelligence and Redwood RunMyJobs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Action Packs are a good feature."
"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."
"The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."
"Redwood manages all complex job workflow processes."
"Multi-platform scheduling makes it easier this way rather than accessing one platform at a time."
"It saves us a lot of time and money by doing jobs automatically."
"The automated alert response is very useful for long-running and failed jobs during off-business hours."
"Redwood is more flexible and we can schedule the tasks based on different time zones."
"It is very easy and easy to use, and minimal supervision is required to run it."
"There are various ways in which you can construct jobs depending on your business needs and requirements."
"Redwood RunMyJobs has been very useful for job scheduling and checking and monitoring jobs."
"Integration of the solution could be improved."
"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."
"The job reporting feature needs improvement."
"It lacks some of the common reporting features. I'm a bit surprised that there aren't some standard reports to be able to extract any data on usage. They've described to us that customers have different reporting needs, so they let them develop those, but reporting is a common need. It would be helpful to have it as part of the solution."
"The reports are downloaded in .CAR file format, which makes it difficult to convert to an Excel file."
"The user interface of Redwood can be improved a bit to make it more user-friendly and interesting."
"The job log has a size limit."
"Enhancing the user interface would make it more appealing and accessible to a wide range of users."
"It has limited reporting features; some basic reporting features are missing."
"I have not noted any downsides."
"The addition of machine learning capabilities could help Redwood Workload Automation Software better predict job and workflow performance, detect anomalies, and optimize operations based on historical data."
More Automic Automation Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Automic Automation Intelligence is ranked 19th in Workload Automation with 3 reviews while Redwood RunMyJobs is ranked 3rd in Workload Automation with 30 reviews. Automic Automation Intelligence is rated 8.6, while Redwood RunMyJobs is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Automic Automation Intelligence writes "Useful multiple scheduler, centralized batch view, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Redwood RunMyJobs writes "Simple to use, increases CPU speed, and reduces the cost of machine time". Automic Automation Intelligence is most compared with AppWorx Workload Automation, AutoSys Workload Automation, Automic Workload Automation and Control-M, whereas Redwood RunMyJobs is most compared with Control-M, Stonebranch, Tidal by Redwood, AutoSys Workload Automation and ActiveBatch by Redwood. See our Automic Automation Intelligence vs. Redwood RunMyJobs report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.