We performed a comparison between Automic Automation Intelligence and AutoSys Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."
"The Action Packs are a good feature."
"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."
"The capabilities of the product to schedule on multiple platforms, multiple operating systems."
"The scheduling feature allows us to know when jobs are going to run and makes sure they run in the order needed."
"The aggregator reporting utility which tells us our throughput in lag and latency."
"It is stable, it works, and it does what it is supposed to."
"The features that I have found most valuable with AutoSys are that it is scalable, easy to use, fast, and always available. That's very important because if it's not steady then it's a real problem. So, at this point, we are satisfied with it."
"I prefer AutoSys over the other ones out there for ease of use, ease of understanding, and getting people to understand how the tool works."
"Inherit Dependencies feature reduces scheduling errors for holiday processing."
"The solution has been stable."
"The job reporting feature needs improvement."
"Integration of the solution could be improved."
"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."
"There is a difference between a web interface and the thick client interface. We particularly like a thick client interface, and it has gone away."
"Quick search feature and job analysis could be improved."
"More benefits with the agent upgrades, and that's about it. Other than that we have no complaints with it. It's been awesome."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"CA installation processes are never anything but complex."
"Some of the reports are either a bit hard to understand or don’t give you what you might expect to see."
"Pricing model for distributed should have an Enterprise option."
"It would be helpful to be able to monitor and manage workload windows so we could minimize downstream applications. This would allow us easier access to the applications."
More Automic Automation Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Automic Automation Intelligence is ranked 19th in Workload Automation with 3 reviews while AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews. Automic Automation Intelligence is rated 8.6, while AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Automic Automation Intelligence writes "Useful multiple scheduler, centralized batch view, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". Automic Automation Intelligence is most compared with AppWorx Workload Automation, Redwood RunMyJobs and Automic Workload Automation, whereas AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Automic Automation Intelligence report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.