We performed a comparison between Automic Workload Automation and HCL Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."Automic is perfect to work with for a lot of job loads."
"The most valuable feature is the one for SAP batch processing... There are certain other mid-level workload automation tools which can handle the OS level, but SAP is something which is really very critical. Automic stands out from the ordinary tools because handling SAP processes is absolutely easy with it."
"It is easy to set up and use. The whole system is complete."
"Stability has been great. My team, we call ourselves "the invisibles" because things run so well that sometimes you almost feel like you have to try to break something to actually get acknowledged."
"We have seen big improvements in automation and automated tasks allowing our people to work on more important things for the company, as well as getting financial data quicker."
"The scalability is good because you can add on as many services and processes as you want."
"It integrates well with the CICD pipeline."
"It will improve how we function. It is just meeting a functional need in a maybe more agile way; it is faster."
"Easy to set up, it doesn't require a lot."
"It has a very complicated interface, which could be made to be more user-friendly."
"The user interface has room for improvement."
"The stability is not as good as it was in former years. Stability has gone down from version to version."
"After the merger, it is getting more American. Now, they do not have support in French and have limited German documentation. This is a critical problem for companies who have older generations who did not have English in school."
"There has to be a better way to visualize things in the application without having so many windows open."
"There are some monitoring features that could be added."
"Automic Workload Automation could improve the SaaS deployment."
"The scalability is limited by the SQL in the background, and that is a problem."
"The interface needs some improvements."
Earn 20 points
Automic Workload Automation is ranked 7th in Workload Automation with 85 reviews while HCL Workload Automation is ranked 25th in Workload Automation. Automic Workload Automation is rated 8.2, while HCL Workload Automation is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Automic Workload Automation writes "A tool requiring an easy setup phase that provides its users with flexibility and flow chart visibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL Workload Automation writes "Easy to set up, good support, and helps to decrease project costs". Automic Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Dollar Universe Workload Automation and SaltStack, whereas HCL Workload Automation is most compared with IBM Workload Automation, Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation and Stonebranch.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
