We performed a comparison between Azure Container Registry and JFrog Container Registry based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Registry solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc."
"The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."
"Provides secure duplication and the option for service webhooks."
"What I like best about Azure Container Registry is that it's fast. It also has 24 x 7 reliability. I didn't face any downtime issues using Azure Container Registry. I also like how secure the solution is, especially as it's from Microsoft."
"We like the fact that this is a secure solution, that employs a token-based system, which can be used to manage all the applications under this product."
"It's great for storing images on containers."
"The solution has built-in resiliency and replication zone availability so it is very stable."
"Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution."
"We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes."
"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."
"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."
"The setup for Azure Container Registry was a bit complex. Still, the main problem was that whenever a new image was generated, that new Docker image needed to be updated in Azure Container Registry."
"They can improve their scalability."
"The setup process is mildly complex. There is no straightforward management platform, so there's a level of complexity to it."
"Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down."
"The solution could always improve its security measures with regard to access."
"The solution has no areas that need improvement."
"The security, dashboards, and monitoring system could be improved."
"The accessibility of Azure Container Registry also has room for improvement because the solution is not always accessible 24 x 7. I experienced this three times when the service wasn't responding, so I could not push or pull images, and I had to decommission Azure Container Registry and redeploy it."
"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."
"The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly."
"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."
Azure Container Registry is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 16 reviews while JFrog Container Registry is ranked 4th in Container Registry with 3 reviews. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.2, while JFrog Container Registry is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Container Registry writes "Self-hosted and works well in hybrid SaaS environments and automation is fast without any breakdowns". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, Harbor, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Red Hat Quay, whereas JFrog Container Registry is most compared with Harbor, Amazon ECR, Red Hat Quay and VMware Harbor Registry. See our Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry report.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
