We performed a comparison between Azure Container Registry and Red Hat Quay based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."
"The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc."
"It's great for storing images on containers."
"The solution has built-in resiliency and replication zone availability so it is very stable."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to download, install and manage."
"Pricing is reasonable."
"Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution."
"Specific tokens can be used to set folder structure or restrict things like read or write access."
"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."
"The solution has become more popular in the last few years but I find that the technical support has not increased their knowledge base, so more knowledgeable support staff can help improve the solution."
"The solution has no areas that need improvement."
"The deployment is an area that needs improvement, as it can take some time to deploy."
"We have found that it is sometimes difficult to pull images from the host application."
"The accessibility of Azure Container Registry also has room for improvement because the solution is not always accessible 24 x 7. I experienced this three times when the service wasn't responding, so I could not push or pull images, and I had to decommission Azure Container Registry and redeploy it."
"It should be easier to use. It can have more graphical interfaces to manage containers. At present, the handling or management of the containers is very basic."
"Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down."
"The setup for Azure Container Registry was a bit complex. Still, the main problem was that whenever a new image was generated, that new Docker image needed to be updated in Azure Container Registry."
"It could be more integrated with other platforms."
Earn 20 points
Azure Container Registry is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 16 reviews while Red Hat Quay is ranked 6th in Container Registry. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.2, while Red Hat Quay is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Quay writes "A stable repository that is easy to use and easy to install". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, JFrog Container Registry, Harbor and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Red Hat Quay is most compared with Harbor, JFrog Container Registry, Amazon ECR and VMware Harbor Registry.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
