We compared Barracuda Intronis Backup and NinjaOne across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Barracuda Intronis Backup is praised for its strong backup capabilities, user-friendly cloud management portal, and staff training opportunities. NinjaOne is highly regarded for its effective monitoring and management features, remote device management, and streamlined software deployments.
Room for Improvement: The Barracuda Intronis Backup could improve its integration, speed, and orchestration capabilities. NinjaOne could benefit from improved remote connectivity, enhanced reporting, a more user-friendly ticketing system.
Service and Support: Customers have consistently praised Barracuda Intronis Backup for their excellent and knowledgeable technical support. However, some reviewers reported challenges with escalation and communication within the support team. NinjaOne generally earned positive feedback for its customer service. Customers expressed satisfaction with issue resolution and comprehensive documentation. However, some reported slow responses from technical support.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Barracuda Intronis Backup is simple and involves configuring IP settings and connecting to Cloud Control. NinjaOne's setup is generally uncomplicated. It may take a few minutes or a full day, depending on the situation.
Pricing: Barracuda Intronis Backup provides a comprehensive and reasonably priced setup package. NinjaOne offers negotiable pricing based on the number of devices, with discounted costs as the scale increases. However, some users perceive NinjaOne as costlier than alternatives.
ROI: Barracuda Intronis Backup provides added financial benefits and time efficiency. NinjaOne delivers a return over time by improving productivity.
Comparison Results: Barracuda Intronis Backup stands out for its extensive training resources and direct cloud mapping, but users would like to see better performance and integration. NinjaOne is praised for its ease of setup and valuable monitoring and management features. However, users say NinjaOne could do a better job optimizing internet connections and managing mobile devices.
"The product is easy to install and use while doing what it is expected to do."
"They are the best support that we have had so far. When you contact or email them, they are very quick to respond. They always have someone available for us. That's what we want as a customer, we want someone to listen to us."
"Most important is its ease of use. You plug it in, follow the steps, and you have your backup file."
"The most valuable feature is unlimited data storage on the cloud. Even if the employee has left the company for a few years, the backup will still be maintained."
"Whenever you have a crash or your service is not working, you can just live-boot the machine and have your service up and running."
"Easy, immediate protection for data that is virtually infinitely scalable."
"It's a one-stop shop, meaning we just program and schedule the backups, decide what is being backed up, and then it automatically replicates and deduplicates."
"We perform backup drills to test the functionality, and we don't have any problems."
"Good at managing updates and for remote support."
"The installation is easy, it only took two minutes."
"It just works as advertised and serves the purpose for which we got it."
"The best feature of NinjaOne is the SLA system. Every IT person can check their performance, how long it takes to resolve an issue, and how many SLAs are breached."
"The most important aspect of this tool is the security it provides our company."
"The most valuable feature we have found currently is probably patch management."
"We can use it for remote monitoring, and it also works great as a troubleshooting tool. We are able to open up a command line or a PowerShell session remotely without having to disrupt the user. They have a limited network device monitoring capability, but for workstation servers, we have the event logs. We can do performance monitoring, system changes, software deployment, and patch management. We can also push scripts. It has a very simple web interface. There are no additional things to do there. Security is also pretty good. It does the same things that the other competitor's tools do. One of the advantages of Ninja is that they have a more capable mobile app, which allows you to see the alerts immediately. I get alerted to major critical issues."
"The tool's most valuable feature is third-party application updates."
"The solution needs fine-grained backup capabilities to service individual users. But this is a minor issue considering all that the product does."
"I would like to see the Live Boot feature extended to Hyper-V machines, in addition to VMware machines."
"We cannot backup Sun Micro systems. They are not currently supported."
"Compared to Avamar and Data Domain (our other systems), the backup speed is slow."
"This solution could be improved with offering lower prices at scale."
"Its speed can be a bit improved, and of course, its pricing can go a lot cheaper."
"I would like to see better integration with third-party applications."
"Some features like CIFS are not supported that would help speed and flexibility."
"NinjaOne's reporting module is cumbersome."
"I want NinjaOne to improve the reports."
"Lacks sufficient integrations with other PSAs."
"I would like to see more scripts for PowerShell commands."
"NinjaOne's pricing and user interface needs improvement."
"I wish that they integrated it with more antivirus solutions. Currently, they only push Defender, but it doesn't really have integration with SentinelOne. It also didn't integrate with Trend Micro, which we were using previously. I would also like to have more control from the mobile app. As of now, I am able to see some performance values, but I can't see, for example, disk activity or disk performance values. If they can improve their app a little bit, it would help greatly. They can also improve the tech interface. If I assign certain techs to a bunch of specific machines, they only get those alerts that they're assigned to."
"It can have more integrations with third-party providers, such as Deep Instinct. They do partner with certain antivirus or remote access tool partners, but they can increase their portfolio to have more choices."
"There was a lot of delay with NinjaOne's ticketing system. For example, when a user creates a ticket and raises an issue, it would take 30 to 40 minutes to appear on the IT side. So the time delay issue is the main point."
Barracuda Intronis Backup is ranked 5th in MSP Backup with 24 reviews while NinjaOne is ranked 4th in MSP Backup with 15 reviews. Barracuda Intronis Backup is rated 8.4, while NinjaOne is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Intronis Backup writes "Finding data to restore is much easier than rummaging through tapes to find backups". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NinjaOne writes "A tool that helps with a lot of configurations and creates automation processes that work perfectly". Barracuda Intronis Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Acronis Cyber Protect and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), whereas NinjaOne is most compared with Atera, N-able N-central, Microsoft Configuration Manager, LogMeIn Central and ConnectWise Automate. See our Barracuda Intronis Backup vs. NinjaOne report.
See our list of best MSP Backup vendors.
We monitor all MSP Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
