We performed a comparison between Basis Testimony and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."It takes less time to complete the regression testing."
"This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain."
"It's simple to set up."
"The high-level security, high standard and compatible SAP are great."
"The stop automation is a great feature."
"For traditional automation, approximately half of our tests end up automated. Therefore, we are saving half the testing time by pushing it off to automation. That gives it an intrinsic benefit of more time for manual testers and business testers to work on possibly more important and interesting things. For some of our applications, they don't just have to do happy path testing anymore, they can go more in-depth and breadth into the process."
"The best feature of UFT by far is its compatibility with a large variety of products, tools and technologies. It is currently a challenge to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully automate tests for so many projects and environments."
"It's not only web-based but also for backend applications; you can also do the integration of the applications."
"Being able to automate different applications makes day-to-day activities a lot easier."
"The GUI and design could be improved."
"They need to reduce the cost because it is pretty high. It's approximately $3,000 per user."
"[Tech support is] not a 10 because what happens with some of our issues is that we might not get a patch quickly and we have to hold on to an application until we get a proper solution."
"I'd like to see test case-related reports included in the solution."
"Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation)."
"Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification."
"Technical support could be improved."
"The AI feature needs improvement. For banking applications, we input formatted text from documents, but the AI feature is recognizing three fields as one field, e.g., for a phone number, it puts all 10 digits in the international code or country code. Then, the script fails."
"We used to run it as a test suite. Micro Focus provides that in terms of a test management tool as ALM, but when we think of integrating with a distributed version control system, like Jenkins, there isn't much integration available. That means we need to make use of external solutions to make it work."
Earn 20 points
Basis Testimony is ranked 17th in Regression Testing Tools while OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Regression Testing Tools with 89 reviews. Basis Testimony is rated 8.0, while OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Basis Testimony writes "User-friendly regression testing that is fast and offers good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Basis Testimony is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, whereas OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
