We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to integrate with other platforms."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT One is you are able to use it with many other technologies. I have not had an instance where the solution was not able to automate or execute automation. I was able to use COBOL to manage some automation."
"The interface is fine and there is nothing else to add in terms of enhancement."
"It's easy to use for beginners and non-technical people."
"Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users."
"The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner."
"It is easy to automate and new personnel can start learning automation using UFT One. You don't have to learn any scripting."
"Micro Focus UFT One is a great tool and can be used in a variety of ways."
"The document understanding is good."
"The detailed logging is invaluable."
"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."
"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."
"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."
"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"It's useful for automating tasks."
"They need to reduce the licensing cost. There's pushback from customers because of the cost."
"They should include AI-based testing features."
"The product doesn't provide free training for the basic features."
"Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense. I wish it was a little more compact."
"Sometimes UFT can take a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected."
"They need to reduce the cost because it is pretty high. It's approximately $3,000 per user."
"The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded."
"Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function."
"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."
"The test manager component could be improved."
"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."
"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."
"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."
"They could improve the visualization of the product."
OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Test Automation Tools with 89 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and Ranorex Studio, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio, froglogic Squish and Opkey. See our OpenText UFT One vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.