We performed a comparison between Bizagi and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution is easy to use and it is a good tool for process modeling."
"The user interface is pretty good."
"Its cost is the most valuable. It is not as expensive. It is also easy to make different types of processes for the users."
"Process management is easy with Bizagi; validating processes and assigning resources is straightforward."
"Great mapping feature that's easy to use."
"With the appropriate governance framework, properly trained business analysts can be empowered to design and build business solutions themselves."
"Agility is most valuable because we can develop so much faster than other tools. We can make requirements, develop, and go out to production much faster. So, agility in the software cycle is most valuable."
"Very user friendly and a professional solution."
"I can have a SharePoint list and connect with users through PowerApps to present the information."
"There is value in being able to collect and compare information in real-time to present alternatives for correcting vulnerabilities."
"We get feedback on a real-time basis, which is actually very useful for us."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"Overall, the tool is very democratic. It's easy for anyone to use. You don't have to be a professional or well-versed in technology."
"As a business person, I design a lot of screens. The solution really resonates with me. Their design is amazing."
"The product has good usability, in terms of low-code applications."
"The model that allows you to establish flow automation is getting a lot of traction from the customer side. It offers a lot of flexibility."
"The technical support is not fast enough and should be improved."
"It works slowly on the cloud, sometimes."
"It is difficult to drive ROI on types of processes involving complex business rules."
"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."
"I would like to see more in terms of analytics and better reporting."
"It needs some better notation functionality."
"Also, the tool sometimes feels not so mature when we find random deploy errors from testing to production environment."
"The solution was very limited."
"The product could be improved by making it a production application and enabling the export of apps."
"I have always felt that you need an IT background to use this solution."
"There is room for improvement in error handling and debugging."
"I’d need more time with it. As of now, I can’t think of an area for improvement."
"PowerApps is still a bit new compared to a slightly more mature product such as OutSystems."
"We'd like more features and less to no coding."
"It would be good if this solution supports standard BPN operations. We are thinking of switching to a BPM solution next year because it is not a BPM solution."
"It's easy to use."
Bizagi is ranked 13th in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, ARIS BPA and Appian, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and ServiceNow Now Platform. See our Bizagi vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.