We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Flow and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."
"In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"The best feature is the automation."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."
"Its stability could be improved."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."
"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is ranked 23rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is rated 8.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Flow writes "A competent solution for integrating enterprise-grade software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". Boomi AtomSphere Flow is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Mendix and AWS Step Functions, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
