We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Flow and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."
"In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."
"It is quite configurable, which is the most exciting feature. We can easily configure it as per our needs."
"Pega BPM has a full suite for any enterprise. It is a process orchestration platform. It has detailed features for case management and workflows."
"Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems."
"The workflow designing and integration are the most valuable features. Also, the UI design was pretty easy."
"The workflows are the most valuable features, particularly for us, because we were attempting to automate processes by utilizing workflows to provide a hands-off comparison between the bot and the human."
"This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"This is a customizable product."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."
"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."
"Its stability could be improved."
"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
"From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need."
"The solution's pricing model or licensing model could be a little better."
"This is an expensive solution."
"To learn Pega, you need to be a partner. If someone just wants to learn Pega for the sake of learning, they won't be able to do so as they don't give access to that."
"The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
"It needs more integration with other platforms."
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is ranked 23rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Flow writes "A competent solution for integrating enterprise-grade software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". Boomi AtomSphere Flow is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Mendix and AWS Step Functions, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
