We performed a comparison between Camunda and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."
"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"The solution is useful for small projects."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"The BPMN diagram is valuable. For our use case of transferring money from one account to another, the connections have to be done in the traditional financial ways. There are a lot of unexpected errors and a lot of instability with this kind of system, and we are using Camunda in order to have clear flows. With BPMN, I can show a flow to my business partner, and the business team can easily understand what's going on. The technical team can understand what the implementation is, and we can model different errors and the process for recovering from these errors."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."
"Provides the ability to automate SharePoint processes (building sites, lists, updating content). You can also automate document and content processes, onboarding and offboarding, and general IT and HR solutions."
"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."
"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"It is a scalable product."
"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."
"It's very tedious to manage."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Visio, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM, Bizagi and AgilePoint. See our Camunda vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
