We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Process Designer is good. We like how we can drag and drop and link the processes up, that works out great for us."
"The initial setup is straightforward and easy. I would give it a nine out of ten."
"I like the APIs and the BPM coach is a good tool. But if I had to pick one, it would be the API."
"I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...The product's installation was easy."
"IBM BPM is easy to deploy."
"Process Modelling, simulation and optimization, integration, UI components."
"This product does the job in terms of executing the workflow."
"It has improved my organization quite a bit. It brought awareness to what the business processes are, even to the business side, who did not necessarily know what they are."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."
"The solution can improve integration with SAP, CRM, and Salesforce, which is not capital-intensive."
"All our clients are changing to microservice and cloud service. However, BPM does not have a solution for microservice and cloud service."
"The analysis reports could be much better."
"I would say the scalability is very good but it's not perfect. It is much more scalable than it has been in the past but... it does require some work to keep it stable. So that is an area that should be improved."
"Performance in the development environment space. I know that they have been taking it off the desktop version and putting on the web, and it is not 100% yet."
"The integration could be improved."
"Also, we would like to see integration with artificial intelligence, machine learning-type of technical capabilities. Right now, there are a lot Watson libraries out there. Building those integrations more, out-of-the-box, from IBM would be a good direction."
"Stability wavers. We have some opportunities for improvement in this space, especially as we approach our target volume of a million transactions a day. It is tough, because it is not necessarily the product. It is more around the platform and infrastructure to support it, so the connectivity to the database, web sessions, and reverse proxies in front of that."
"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."
"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
"The security features for this solution need to be improved."
"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, Bizagi and AgilePoint. See our IBM BPM vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.