We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Endpoint and N-able EDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The stability is very good."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"The solution has good threat intelligence features."
"The dashboard is user-friendly and easy to understand."
"It is quite easy to use and deploy the agent on endpoints to protect them from bad actors."
"SandBlast Agent is always working in the background collecting sensitive data, forensics, and notifying users whenever there is a chance of a brute-force attack into our systems. Otherwise, it has been protecting our data at various geographies along with the endpoints that we set up on the cloud. They have been able to filter out or thwart any attacks from the very word, "Go," and make our work very safe and smooth."
"We're able to secure all endpoints and manage them from a single console."
"Check Point Harmony Endpoint can be easily deployed and is cost effective and more secure."
"The level of security and visibility they provide is great and it is very easy to configure and maintain."
"Harmony's endpoint sandboxing is really good."
"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"Detections could be improved."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"There was a learning curve for our general population of employees (the user)."
"Its customer support services and user interface could be improved."
"They could be focused on the analysis of USB devices."
"The response from the tool's support team, which starts with L1, is something my company doesn't find helpful, especially when compared to the other solutions that we use."
"The management in Check Point Harmony Endpoint could be improved."
"The patch management and upgrades are not timely."
"We did have some early compatibility issues, which I hope Check Point has since resolved."
"An additional feature I would like to see involves the VPN."
"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."
Earn 20 points
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is ranked 8th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 104 reviews while N-able EDR is ranked 56th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated 8.8, while N-able EDR is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Endpoint writes "Excellent anti-ransomware protection, zero-day phishing protection, and web browsing filtering". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N-able EDR writes "Stable, effective rollback feature, and useful AI models". Check Point Harmony Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas N-able EDR is most compared with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Elastic Security, Cisco Secure Endpoint and ESET Inspect.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.