We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Ubiquiti WLAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"I like the record that is being kept and multiple SSDs."
"I really love their cloud-based dashboard which allows me to see all my locations from one location."
"The fact that Cisco Meraki is cloud based and is reasonably priced has been most valuable."
"The solution is easy to install."
"The management console is valuable."
"The network security the solution provides is its most valuable aspect."
"Its management is most valuable. It is the major feature of Meraki."
"The dashboard to keep track of 30 or so APs, switches, routers and logs, is invaluable. I liked the UX on this."
"The management features are valuable."
"Anyone can buy the product off the shelf and configure it."
"The ease of use and simplicity of the solution is its most valuable feature. This tool is best suited for small environments."
"You can save backups of this controller locally and then I can export it to wherever I want."
"For me, the ease of configuration is a valuable feature."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the workflow-driven setup for the infrastructure component."
"The most valuable feature of Ubiquiti WLAN is its stability."
"Ubiquiti WLAN's most valuable features are that it works well in a hybrid environment and isn't heavy on resources."
"The price could be better."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The solution could be cheaper."
"Its price should be reduced."
"Our only concern at this stage is how it's licensed."
"The integration options with third-party applications need enhancement."
"It is not a very stable solution."
"There could be more functionality."
"They could also add some more controls for guest access. For example, when you have a captive portal, it would be nice to limit the amount of time users can stay connected per day. Right now, you can only configure the splash frequency. And you can set the connection for one hour, but you have to use the billing feature."
"We would like the solution to work on the pricing of the solution. It would be ideal if it could bring the overall costs down."
"The product’s bandwidth could be better."
"The solution should support a larger bandwidth or distance between the access points and the main stations."
"Ubiquiti WLAN needs to expand the models with external antennas. It needs to improve stability."
"When they release new products, you should know if there backward compatibility, or do you have to replace the entire forklift, It is useful to understand their strategy and where they are headed."
"The room for improvement is in the controller levels."
"Ubiquiti WLAN is not a cheap solution."
"During the configuration, we cannot get information on the network level from the regular interface."
"Ubiquiti WLAN would be improved with the addition of individual AP configuration, which would allow for fine-tuning of individual access points and logins."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 39 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud and Cisco Wireless, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Huawei Wireless and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.