We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless and Ubiquiti WLAN based on our users’ reviews in our categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Both solutions received very positive reviews from users. Cisco Wireless has a slight edge over Ubiquiti WLAN since users feel it has better stability and better technical support.
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The simplicity is great."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"Cisco Wireless is quite convenient for mobile and laptop access."
"Good connectivity and easy to configure."
"Cisco Wireless is one of the more stable products so their products are scalable."
"The capacity, security, downloading, and exporting data are all very good. It's user-friendly, but if I look at Meraki versus normal Cisco equipment, then I think that Meraki will be much more user-friendly."
"Cisco Wireless is mostly stable with a low downrate and the signal rate is good. It is also easy to use."
"Stable and scalable with good technical support."
"The ability to disable RRM or set hybrid RRM provides a more granular design of RF in the environment."
"The ability to deploy wireless access points with templates."
"The most valuable feature is the level of security on the Wi-Fi network."
"Great management interface."
"Its most valuable feature is pricing."
"The pricing is very competitive and the feature sets are very good. It compares well against more expensive options."
"Ubiquiti WLAN has been stable and is easy to install."
"The solution works well and in the short time I have used it, I've enjoyed its capabilities."
"Ubiquiti WLAN has good availability, and it is much cheaper."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"The solution is expensive."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"There are some features I would like to have in Cisco Wireless, such as Telemetry and other IoT. However, they are available in the new version of the solution."
"The solution's pricing should be improved."
"The price should be reduced. It should be cheaper."
"No product can be a ten out of ten and there are some security issues."
"In the next release, I would like to have support for Wi-Fi 6."
"In Latin America, Cisco is very expensive in comparison to other technologies."
"An expensive solution that small companies cannot afford."
"The technical support could be better. They aren't as helpful as they need to be when we run into issues."
"It is not a stable solution."
"The solution should support a larger bandwidth or distance between the access points and the main stations."
"When I started to upgrade, the controller for Unbuntu was really struggling to start up, however, that has since been solved."
"The coverage could be increased."
"Ubiquiti WLAN would be improved with the addition of individual AP configuration, which would allow for fine-tuning of individual access points and logins."
"The product’s bandwidth could be better."
"The solution needs to improve robustness, security, and stability."
"The product's area of concern revolves around its lack of support."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Wireless is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 147 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 38 reviews. Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Allows us to deploy a wide range of wireless products with stable WiFi". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Mist AI and Cloud and Omada Access Points, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Huawei Wireless, Omada Access Points and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi. See our Cisco Wireless vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.