We performed a comparison between Cisco SD-WAN and FatPipe SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."The most valuable feature is the ease of central management."
"Troubleshooting is swift, allowing for fast turnaround times whenever we encounter an issue."
"Cisco SD-WAN is a highly stable solution."
"The orchestration on the VPN connection between remote locations is a fantastic feature. I used it some time ago."
"The solution is good to use and easy to handle and manage from the centralized location or from the cloud."
"The segmented traffic it provides is the best in the industry right now."
"The solution can scale. We haven't had any issues doing so."
"The most valuable features of Cisco SD-WAN are reliability and scalability."
"The most valuable feature of FatPipe SD-WAN is it's based on SD-WAN technology."
"The solution is expensive and could be cheaper."
"The initial setup was not very straightforward, but it gets easier the more deployments you complete."
"Technical support could be more helpful and responsive."
"We don't have any issues with this solution other than the price."
"We recently found some bugs."
"Cisco needs to improve the technical support for this solution."
"Since most user-data is going through the solution, we are concerned about security, as all the information is in the cloud and not on-premises. The user data authentification should be higher to better prevent malicious attacks."
"It should also be much more affordable for a larger number of customers."
"FatPipe SD-WAN can improve the price to scale the solution."
Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 86 reviews while FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 16th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 1 review. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "A solution for integrating services to enhance up-time, performance and lower costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FatPipe SD-WAN writes "Beneficial technology, reliable, and simple deployment". Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Juniper Session Smart Router and Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform, whereas FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with VMware SD-WAN and Fortinet FortiGate.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.