We performed a comparison between FatPipe SD-WAN and VMware SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."The most valuable feature of FatPipe SD-WAN is it's based on SD-WAN technology."
"It is very simple to configure. When you use the cloud to configure the equipment, it has zero-touch provisioning."
"I love the solution because of its many features like cluster and cloud VPN."
"One of the standout features is its ability to dynamically manage enterprise networks based on applications."
"I would absolutely recommend VeloCloud because it's user-friendly and because the integration is easier than with other solutions."
"VMware SD-WAN is scalable."
"The most valuable feature of VMware SD-WAN is the virtualization platform. You can use the software on any hardware. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."
"VMware SD-WAN is easy-to-use."
"It's scalable."
"FatPipe SD-WAN can improve the price to scale the solution."
"I would like to see more features added to increase visibility."
"Some of the service providers that use VeloCloud as their SD-WAN should be enabled to have better global visibility."
"VeloCloud needs improvement in terms of its security features."
"There should be more automation and self-service features."
"VMware SD-WAN can improve on the security features."
"Implementing VMware is much more difficult, time-consuming, and expensive than implementing Fortinet or Check Point."
"VMware SD-WAN is harder than Cisco. It is complex, and we must take many steps to get the service. I think it would be beneficial if obtaining licenses could be simplified. Currently, numerous options and integrations are bundled together, which can make it quite complex."
"If you don't have an Internet connection, you can’t control it."
FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 16th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 1 review while VMware SD-WAN is ranked 4th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 50 reviews. FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while VMware SD-WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of FatPipe SD-WAN writes "Beneficial technology, reliable, and simple deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SD-WAN writes "To fully utilize cloud vendors' hardware networking, Microsoft and VMware support everything". FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate and Cisco SD-WAN, whereas VMware SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Netskope .
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.