We performed a comparison between Datto Remote Monitoring and Management and TeamViewer Remote Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has a single pane of glass, and it integrates well with other software."
"The project management and task management features work well. It's a decent product in that regard."
"The alerting system helps us determine what are high level alerts, and what are alerts which can wait for a day or two. We catch RAID failures, hot servers, bad drives (or predicted failures on drives), etc."
"The remote tool is nice. If a user needs assistance, I don't have to tell the user to do anything. I just ask the user if I can remote in, and 30 seconds later, I have remoted in. It has been really handy."
"Automation, in terms of the standard patches and standard updates, and remote support are valuable. When it does the standard Windows and patches, it works really well. This is something they focus on. Remote support is also something they focus on quite a bit, and it works really well. Being able to get to an agent or a client computer right away is very helpful."
"Even when the connection to the server is lost, the monitoring continues without interruption."
"AEM support is great for Macs."
"I also like how Datto integrates seamlessly with the Autotask ticketing system."
"The most valuable feature is the remote management capabilities."
"The stability seems to be pretty good so far."
"There are some great features."
"What I like about TeamViewer Remote Management is the chat feature on the dashboard, which is very useful. The solution also has a meeting feature, but I don't use that. The remote feature and other features of TeamViewer Remote Management also work fine, so it's a good solution."
"We use the product to communicate."
"The remote access is most valuable."
"TeamViewer Remote Management is very easy and very good for remote work."
"The product is very stable."
"They have a tab to provide information about the type of hardware the computers have. One thing they don't specify is what model of hard drive the computers have. Identification of storage models would be nice."
"The CRM capabilities are not very good. It's clunky and could work a lot better than it does. There are no marketing add-ins, for example."
"Sometimes we have some downtime when Datto is doing updates. Maybe it's because of the cloud service they use. I'm not sure if they're going through AWS or Azure or what. That's happened, but the outages have been few and far between."
"Be prepared to spend a lot of time on conversions if you have a lot of clients."
"The actual setup and the automation of their product are horrific. When you buy it, there is nothing out of the box. You have to custom design it for everything you want it to do. You pay for implementation, but they don't really do a whole lot to help you get it going. I know it does a lot more than what ours is set up to do, which is frustrating. When I've demoed other systems, their setup is so much better. When you pay for their setup, there is so much more, whereas I just feel like we didn't get a very good setup."
"We would like to see a little more functionality when monitoring network devices, such as switches and routers."
"My most significant criticism is Datto is a complex product that takes a while to understand, but that could be said of almost any solution at the same level. It depends on where you're starting from. You have to rework all your workflows, and it's some heavy lifting if you want to get it right."
"The only area where I see room for improvement is the ability to delay the application of patches for a set number of days."
"There could be stable connectivity for the product’s current technology."
"VPN connection is an area with shortcomings that need improvement in the solution."
"The security of the solution could be more secure."
"One feature to add would be a mobile remote feature."
"Maybe TeamViewer could be improved with more scalability."
"I don't like having so many updates."
"If you have one version, like if you have version 14, and the client has version 15, you can't access his computer. If the client is on 14 and the technician is on 15, he can't access the end user who's at home. So there's a disparity in versioning."
"AnyDesk is easier compared to TeamViewer Remote Management since there is no password. We use AnyDesk more."
More Datto Remote Monitoring and Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datto Remote Monitoring and Management is ranked 8th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 8 reviews while TeamViewer Remote Management is ranked 3rd in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 33 reviews. Datto Remote Monitoring and Management is rated 7.8, while TeamViewer Remote Management is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Datto Remote Monitoring and Management writes "A solution that functions optimally even when the connection to the server is lost". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Remote Management writes "Highly stable and scalable solution". Datto Remote Monitoring and Management is most compared with Atera, Microsoft Configuration Manager, PRTG Network Monitor, Kaseya VSA and ServiceNow, whereas TeamViewer Remote Management is most compared with Azure Bastion, NinjaOne and Kaseya VSA. See our Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs. TeamViewer Remote Management report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.