We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Application Security and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."
"The software quality gate streamlines the product's quality."
"SonarQube: Recording of issues over a period of time, with an indication of the addition in the new issues or the reduction of existing issues (which were fixed)."
"The customizable dashboard and ability to include results and coverage from unit test and other static analysis code tools."
"The depth features I have found most valuable. You receive a quick comprehensive comparison overview regarding the current release and the last release and what type of depths dependency or duplication should be used. This is going to help you to make a more readable code and have more flexibility for the engineers to understand how things should work when they do not know."
"It is a good deal compared to all other tools on the market."
"The overall quality of the indicator is good."
"Provides local scanning for developers."
"The tool helps us to monitor and manage violations. It manages the bugs and security violations."
"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."
"The pricing could be reduced a bit. It's a little expensive."
"Monitoring is a feature that can be improved in the next version."
"SonarQube could be improved by implementing inter-procedural code analysis capabilities, allowing for a more comprehensive detection of defects and vulnerabilities across the entire codebase."
"If you don't have any experience with the configuration or how to configure the files, it can be complicated."
"I would also like SonarQube to be able to write custom scanning rules. More documentation would be helpful as well because some of our guys were struggling with the customization script."
"Lacks sufficient visibility and documentation."
"After scanning our code and generating a report, it would be helpful if SonarQube could also generate a solution to fix vulnerabilities in the report."
"Dynamic scanning is missing and there are some issues with security scanning."
Digital.ai Application Security is ranked 36th in Application Security Tools with 1 review while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 110 reviews. Digital.ai Application Security is rated 6.0, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Application Security writes "Helps to improve knowledge on software security ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Digital.ai Application Security is most compared with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify Application Defender, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
