We performed a comparison between DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One of the things that I like about DX Infrastructure is that the topology is good enough to see what is happening in the infrastructure. You also get alerts if something is happening in the network. There are many features and benefits. It is serving our customers in knowing exactly how their network is performing in terms of reliability. It also helps them in planning the capacity. They know how much bandwidth the branches are consuming."
"Having all of our information within one tool set; our alerts, our monitors, and the things that our operations team needs to function."
"The monitoring of the applications to let our business know when things are performing and that they're up and available."
"It is easy to implement."
"It gives an alarm when there's something going on, not just when there's an expected spike that happens every night on a server."
"I can use the Drag and Drop feature to build dashboards within minutes."
"DX UIM is scalable."
"We are able to go in and actually leverage the thick client for a nice easy drag and drop solution."
"The most valuable feature of SCCM is the application distribution."
"This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD."
"It is a good choice for deployment that performs very well."
"It uses detailed descriptions of the workstations, and that is good for me."
"SCCM is a stable solution."
"The product is very stable compared to older versions."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to learn."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's incredibly simple to configure and execute changes in bulk, allowing for seamless deployment. With this solution, you can easily track the status of all modifications and send them with ease, making it a comprehensive and efficient solution for any necessary adjustments."
"Within this product there are individual probes, and each of these probes doesn't always necessarily output the same kind of information into our database. So when we try to collect what's called QoS data, from one probe we might get a ton of information, lots of good stuff that we can use in our database, but then from another probe, we might not get so much or we might not be able to pull the things that we want to."
"It would be good to implement views showing the aggregated status graphically."
"Making a GUI with criteria such as selection by robot/hub/probe etc."
"DX UIM's reporting and customization need to be improved."
"How we can get more native information from CA's solutions."
"In the UMP, certain devices will show up multiple times and they don't correlate correctly. That's one of the issues."
"The dashboards need to be improved."
"We would like to see automatic network topology."
"The solution could improve the functionality for automating, license management. Additionally, more and better-looking reports are needed."
"In spite of us being a premier customer we find the support unsatisfactory."
"Its client interface should be more accessible, and the notifications should be more customizable from the console. It should be more user friendly and have some kind of customized notifications so that we can use it on the client side. These are the reasons why we restricted its use only for the server environment and didn't use it on the client side."
"The tool's deployment can be cumbersome."
"The assets have reached their end-of-life, and patching them is a complex and laborious task. It would be highly advantageous if there were an integrated solution that provided distinct options for each end-of-life asset, streamlining the process and facilitating comprehension."
"The solution should be more compatible with different versions of Linux."
"The solution is a bit heavy on the sources such as RAM or CPU and the software needs to be a bit lighter."
"Our company would prefer not rebooting computers while people are using them. There seems to be no strategy behind it."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
DX Unified Infrastructure Management is ranked 14th in Server Monitoring with 120 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews. DX Unified Infrastructure Management is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of DX Unified Infrastructure Management writes "Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". DX Unified Infrastructure Management is most compared with DX SaaS, DX Spectrum, SCOM, ManageEngine OpManager and Nagios XI, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, BigFix, Microsoft Intune and Tanium. See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.