We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and Sysdig Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Elastic and others in Container Monitoring."The most valuable feature is the beautiful UI."
"It can give a quick overview of the current health status, end to end, and can quickly point to the root cause if there an issue or problem in one of our applications."
"It has helped us deliver better solutions to our end customers, and helps them in their digital transformation journey."
"We also got know many internal code bugs which could have caused memory leaks or other issues which we were not able to catch during that development phase."
"It helps to show where the problem is and isolates the issue."
"The dashboard customization based on the performance metric requirement is one of the most exciting features."
"You can see every step a transaction goes through, which servers it hits, and what technology it uses."
"We used to rely on multiple operations tools to monitor and obtain bits and pieces. Now, we have it all in a single pane of glass."
"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."
"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like "first class citizens"."
"There are a lot of features that could be added that would make this a very useful solution, but it is getting there."
"In regards to Diffie-Hellman encryption stuff, it is a hurdle with what we are doing with DC RUM, where everyone is embracing stronger security suites, but the whole point of DC RUM is to get that data between the tiers."
"I did like the old dashboards, the legacy 6.3 for example; the way we were able to do the dashboarding in the client. I would like to be able to see that in the new version of Dynatrace."
"DevOps plugin monitoring tools need improvement."
"Data streaming and dashboard loading can be improved to reduce dashboard latency."
"Log analytics in the classic synthetic and RUM tools would be a great addition."
"It needs container log monitoring."
"This solution needs better support for security and monolithic batch processes."
""Events" reporting (errors, crashes, etc.) is not clear at all in a Mesos environment (i.e., it's not clear what specific container is the one that went down). In a Docker Compose environment, it may be way better."
"It is needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."
Earn 20 points
Dynatrace is ranked 1st in Container Monitoring with 341 reviews while Sysdig Monitor is ranked 9th in Container Monitoring. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while Sysdig Monitor is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sysdig Monitor writes "The ability to stop and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas Sysdig Monitor is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
See our list of best Container Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Container Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.