We compared ExtremeWireless and Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: ExtremeWireless stands out for its straightforward and efficient installation process, whereas the ease and complexity of Juniper Switches can vary. ExtremeWireless is highly regarded for its dependability, scalability, and seamless integration with network fabric. On the other hand, Juniper switches are valued for their combination of hardware and software, MPLS capabilities, and user-friendly interface. However, ExtremeWireless requires regular maintenance and comes with a higher cost, while Juniper switches receive mixed feedback regarding pricing, stability, and documentation. Juniper's customer service and support receive high praise, while opinions on the quality of support for ExtremeWireless are divided.
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The solution is stable."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The solution is very secure."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The simplicity is great."
"I like Cloud IQ, ExtremeWireless' cloud controller and analytics platform. It's full of information, easy to use, and provides excellent visibility into my network."
"It's reliable and works well. It's pretty stable."
"ExtremeWireless is a powerful solution with good integration. It works perfectly for us."
"The most valuable feature is the cloud-managed aspect."
"The stability of the solution has been fine."
"ExtremeWireless has good performance."
"The security is very good."
"The wireless security solution is the most valuable feature of ExtremeWireless."
"The most valuable feature is switching on our network."
"The virtual Chassis feature for stacking is good in general, with high bandwidth for the link, which is good."
"The performance is very good."
"The campus switches and access switches are the most valuable and simple to deploy for Virtual Chassis."
"The most valuable feature is that Juniper is multiple kernels, so there's isolation, which means you won't get a process that runs away, creating problems across the whole platform."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Ethernet Switches is the public remote configuration option. If you make a mistake in the configuration you can roll it back to the previous configuration automatically after a set time frame increment, such as five or more minutes. In all the other competitors once you press to enter the new configuration is already written in. You cannot roll it back automatically."
"In terms of performance, Juniper switches have a more user-friendly interface and more features than Cisco products."
"Juniper is the best when it comes to the core layer."
"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"The price could be better."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The product must be provided at a cheaper price."
"They could provide different product models. Additionally, there could be a feature to manage devices."
"ExtremeWireless should fix some general bugs and make the user interface more user-friendly."
"The cost is a little high."
"The main area for improvement is the company's local visibility."
"The onsite controllers are not as good as the cloud controller. I would also like ExtremeWireless to add web filtering on the access point. This feature is available from other vendors but not ExtremeWireless."
"The reports could prove in ExtremeWireless. However, we are in the early stages of use and we might be able to configure them better."
"The solution must include integrated IoT solutions on their wireless APs."
"The durability of the devices could be better."
"The tool should improve its fabric."
"Juniper EX Series could improve the process and ease of updating the software. It is a difficult process."
"Wireless and monitoring definitely could be improved."
"More security could be provided, especially with the rising cyber-attacks in business organizations."
"Support could be improved."
"Juniper Ethernet Switches would be improved by upgrading the uplink port in EX2300 categories service from 10G to 25G."
"It was very difficult to get technical support, here in Egypt. There is no local support available."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →
ExtremeWireless is ranked 13th in Wireless LAN with 21 reviews while Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is ranked 8th in Ethernet Switches with 65 reviews. ExtremeWireless is rated 8.0, while Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ExtremeWireless writes "An easy to deploy solution that can scale and expand". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches writes "Provides campus switches and access switches that are simple to deploy, but the code isn't stable enough for a leaf and spine design". ExtremeWireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, ExtremeCloud IQ and Cisco Wireless, whereas Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is most compared with Cisco Ethernet Switches, Aruba Switches, Arista Networks Platform, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches and Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
