We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Forcepoint tool is well developed. It is ranked in many evaluations at the top when it comes to enterprise DLP solutions. It has good artificial intelligence that enables our customers to focus on specific incidents, instead of having a complicated list of uncategorized incidents."
"I like the SaaS solution they're offering now a little bit more. It's a new product but it's easy to install and configure."
"Our organization's intellectual property is not misused or extracted without permission."
"The solution offers very good sensitive data protection."
"Scalability-wise, I rate this solution a nine out of ten."
"The workflow remediation is quite good. That is a key feature because of which it has the upper hand over other DLP solutions."
"We don't require a lot of downtime, but when we do then we are getting proper support with no issue."
"Forcepoint DLP's most valuable feature is that it provides complete end-to-end security."
"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."
"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."
"It is a stable solution with good support."
"Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pros →
"Their discovery or the way they discover the data at risk can also be improved. There are many database servers that are not supported by Forcepoint."
"We want to be able to do data classification better in the product and reduce false positives, especially on data loss prevention."
"One area that could be improved is the support. The current support is not very good. Because they don't come on time when a customer really needs it, they take a lot of time to troubleshoot anything."
"The tool needs to integrate data classification."
"They can improve a bit in the OCR category. The OCR deployment could be simplified. Right now, you have to set up a separate server to manage all the data going through the network, especially the images. Forcepoint could better integrate the OCR component with central management."
"The reporting features, the real-time reporting, can be improved in Forcepoint. On the dashboard, we don't have a feature that shows real-time incidents. We have to schedule a report in the environment."
"The deployment and troubleshooting aspects of Forcepoint need improving."
"The ease of deployment wasn't as flexible as Digital Guardian."
"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."
"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."
"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."
"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Cons →
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is ranked 14th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention writes "A solution having automation as one of its strongest points". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, whereas Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler DLP, Cyberhaven, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Check Point CloudGuard Code Security. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.