We performed a comparison between GeneXus and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is fast in creating systems and connects to the database quickly."
"GeneXus evolves with technology."
"I like that it's very compatible with other tools. The most important feature is getting the developer to focus on the project's business case. It's not about focusing on how I can command this or how I can develop a front end, or how I can work with the advantages. The developer should focus on the business case of the project. No need to focus on connecting the database to the server or connecting the server and the front end. The developer can concentrate on the views."
"The integration module is the most valuable feature of this solution for our business, as it allows our clients to create new systems based on their outdated databases, across all API's."
"The front-end features are the most valuable."
"I find the implementation process of GeneXus to be easy."
"This solution works extremely quickly in terms of enabling an application in a production environment."
"The most valuable feature is that GeneXus works with several languages. It's possible to develop chatbots and other functionalities."
"The product has good usability, in terms of low-code applications."
"It allows us to provide all the information in one single place."
"It offers integration with several Microsoft products, including SharePoint and Outlook, in my opinion, is a huge plus."
"For all no-code platforms that let you create a front end, you can click together something very quick."
"Creating a PowerApp is very easy. All I do is link and share the result with my colleagues. Deployment is very fast."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"Of all of the solutions I evaluated, it was the easiest to use and deploy."
"I can have a SharePoint list and connect with users through PowerApps to present the information."
"It's expensive for a company."
"I told them to add something about Angular. They're already working on adding it."
"It would be better if GeneXus had a wiki. The developer needs some experience to work with the tools. It would be better if they could improve the community. If we have some problem, I open a ticket that takes us to a board, and I have to describe my issue in detail. If the tools have a general community for us to explore with some videos or some articles, I think that that may help the developer."
"We would like to see more extensions and more user controls added to the front-end of this solution, in order to help developers manage the website."
"The tool needs to be tuned before being used. You need some experience to get the best out of the tool."
"GeneXus's user interface has room for improvement."
"The front-end with GeneXus is not as good as the back-end."
"The graphical interface could be improved. I also notice some performance problems on hardware that should be more than adequate. GeneXus uses a lot of RAM and other computer resources."
"There is room for improvement with the amount of code required to implement the expense classification app."
"One area where the solution lacks is the limited size of the database it offers its users."
"The scalability of the solution could improve."
"The pricing structure needs to be improved, the current information is confusing."
"It would be beneficial to have a feature that allows users to split the opportunity into separate logs for each product."
"The user interface is pretty good, although it is a little bit clunky and can be improved."
"The fact that we couldn't share that with our other organization or outside of the organization, consisting of our colleagues in the joint ventures, was a weakness of the solution."
"In terms of workflow automation, I believe that capabilities for creating the entire business process are required, or, at the very least, the option to model the business process, define complex business events, handle them, and route them to appropriate business stakeholders."
GeneXus is ranked 12th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 13 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Low-Code Development Platforms with 78 reviews. GeneXus is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of GeneXus writes "Fast, stable, and allows us to model a workflow before developing the screens". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". GeneXus is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), OutSystems, Mendix, Magic xpa Application Platform and Ionic, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our GeneXus vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.