We performed a comparison between HCL Domino and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of HCL Domino is how robust it is."
"HCL Domino is the best product from a security point of view."
"The most valuable features of the solution are security and integration."
"The DAOS feature is the most valuable. It helps to save some of my storage."
"They offer good support and provide a roadmap."
"I find the HCL Domino server scalable."
"We have been able to set up a portal using a special XPage application that gives our customers access to this system."
"This solution can be used for workflow application so that applications can be easily developed."
"The most valuable features are low-code and fast development."
"The solution allows you to use data to create excellent UI and quickly deliver an app. It speeds up production time."
"The flows are good because they can be used in a variety of situations."
"Microsoft PowerApps allows you to simplify business processes and user experience. You can also create responsive applications and canvas apps through this solution. It's an easy to scale, stable, and low-code solution."
"It's very easy to build an app using this solution."
"Creating a PowerApp is very easy. All I do is link and share the result with my colleagues. Deployment is very fast."
"The scalability is good."
"We particularly like the workflow connectors in the forms, for information introduction purposes."
"When you compare with Microsoft Exchange, the UI could be more user-friendly."
"From the Domino side, it should support DKIM and DMARC."
"HCL Domino could have a better interface."
"The client version of this solution could be faster and be made simpler for non-IT users. You will need to have some knowledge of Notes to correctly install this solution."
"The solution could improve Kubernetes or Dockers migration to new environments in the cloud."
"Recently, IBM sold the product to HCL. Since Pakistan and India have some problems on a domestic level, we were actually considering replacing it with Indian products from the organization. We're just facing some regulatory issues."
"An area for improvement in HCL Domino is security. New enhancements in the IT industry mean that security should be improved. The HCL Domino GUI also needs improvement."
"The product's user interface is one of its shortcomings since it is outdated, making it an area for improvement."
"It's sometimes hard to import groups of options. At this point, I need to enter those manually and it slows the process down."
"The product could be improved by making it a production application and enabling the export of apps."
"Customer support needs improvement."
"I’d need more time with it. As of now, I can’t think of an area for improvement."
"We'd like to see more integration capabilities in the future."
"It's easy to use."
"It has to improve the threshold limit where it can handle data beyond 5000 items."
"Integration with databases and other tools needs to be improved."
HCL Domino is ranked 17th in Rapid Application Development Software with 17 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews. HCL Domino is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of HCL Domino writes "A stable and versatile enterprise solution consolidating various functions like email, collaboration, and application development in a user-friendly manner". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". HCL Domino is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, HCL Notes, Zimbra Collaboration, Microsoft Exchange Online and HCL Verse, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and FlutterFlow. See our HCL Domino vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.