We performed a comparison between IBM Rational System Architect and MEGA HOPEX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Architecture Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are a lot of features I find valuable, but I think that the metamodel customization is one of the best features that the solution offers."
"We have seen ROI with this solution over the years that we have used it."
"The user interface is good. It's both clear and comprehensible. It's easy to work with."
"The solution is pretty stable."
"It is very interactive."
"An advantage is its accessibility."
"The support experience in Latin America is great."
"Every module sets up the same information in a unique repository."
"MEGA offers a more integrated GRC platform to facilitate enhanced coordination between the functions of Risk, Compliance, and Internal Audit on a single platform solution - HOPEX."
"It generates friendly websites and presents specific views of the enterprise (business, functional, applicative, technological, and infrastructure)."
"I find the IT portfolio management very valuable and helpful."
"The most valuable parts of this solution are the richness of its features and its easy interface."
"The reverse engineering of the database is already there, but in the next release I would like to see some pilot supplied with the solution in order to address any database."
"The solution needs to better integrate with other products, like Microsoft."
"There needs to be more information at the outset about how to use the solution and how to deploy it. The deployment process needs improvement."
"This solution can be more user-friendly and easier to use, with better dashboards."
"The interface must be improved."
"Better documentation and training would be helpful."
"There could be continuous AI enhancements for the platform."
"The product must improve integration with other tools."
"It takes a long time to learn how to use HOPEX. It's hard to work with it because the user interface is bad. For example, if you want to build a complex system diagram, you need a lot of knowledge to do this correctly and make it readable. In MEGA, you need to create a report and it takes a long time to publish it. The publishing is offline. With RDoC, everything is online."
"Lacking more out of the box integrations."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"An area for improvement in MEGA HOPEX is its vast learning curve. The tool is also heavy, so that's a pain point. MEGA HOPEX is also tricky to use if you don't train for many hours."
Earn 20 points
IBM Rational System Architect is ranked 20th in Enterprise Architecture Management while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 37 reviews. IBM Rational System Architect is rated 7.4, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Rational System Architect writes "Modeling is useful, but many features need improvement and technical support is lacking". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Interactive with good functionality and helps with productivity". IBM Rational System Architect is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, erwin Data Modeler by Quest and UNICOM System Architect, whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Visio and Avolution ABACUS. See our IBM Rational System Architect vs. MEGA HOPEX report.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
