We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and ManageEngine Log360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have the abilities to monitor each instance which originates on the process along with the performance of each department."
"In terms of the most valuable features, the log collections and log processing mechanisms are good. They have good dashboards."
"It showed us where weaknesses were in our environment, so we could actively target those patches first."
"This is a good tool to have because it gives you the ability to track what is currently happening in your environment."
"It is a pretty solid product for the type that it is representing. It is a CM solution as compared to Splunk or ArcSight from HP. It is also user friendly. It comes with some internal AI as well, in which it automatically maps multiple lots from unrelated devices and makes a smart decision to link them back and create an offense based on that. It is a smart tool."
"The threat hunting capabilities in general are great."
"The most valuable feature is user behavior analytics (UBA)."
"A nice benefit is when we go to the process of selecting our youth cases, they go by building blocks. QRadar links it to building blocks."
"We haven't had any stability issues."
"It is nice to be able to monitor and to have notifications."
"You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is more secure than others, and there are more applications and features as well."
"ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy."
"The deployment is quite simple and pretty straightforward."
"The most valuable features for us are the application logs monitoring and the dashboard, which provides a single-pane view of all the ongoing activities."
"The reports that you can run are really nice."
"If you have too many events that occur, then the storage capacity becomes a problem. You need to have more storage."
"This solution is on-premise and many customers are moving to the cloud base solution."
"Technical support could be improved by a bit."
"I would like to see the update process simplified."
"The features that could be improved include the licensing model and the dashboards and all those presentations. Overall, the user experience part can be improved."
"The architecture could be improved. I got stuck for a long time trying to understand the architecture, as it is quite challenging."
"They should provide more manual examples online so that I can learn it myself."
"Integration could be better. They should make it easy to integrate with other solutions."
"It takes a little bit of time for Log360 to actually learn your environment."
"The graphical interface could be made easier to use when you are connecting to different network equipment."
"It's difficult to find which conditions have been applied to a report because they are provided by default by ManageEngine. However, with other SIEMs if you want to create a report, they provide details, like which conditions are triggering certain reports. This needs to be there in ManageEngine. It would be good to know which parameter has been applied to the report that is updating the system."
"Their technical support should be improved."
"The support needs improvement."
"There is room for improvement, especially in the reporting aspect. The reports are not as good as those in Splunk."
"Most times log sheets are not assigned well."
"We can log in as a local user, and it's fine, but when we login with an Active Directory user, we cannot."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while ManageEngine Log360 is ranked 27th in Log Management with 15 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine Log360 is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Log360 writes "Facilitates incident backtracking and identifying the cause of incidents but insufficient intelligence-driven analysis to suppress unnecessary alerts". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas ManageEngine Log360 is most compared with ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Fortinet FortiSIEM and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors, best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors, and best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.