We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and NAKIVO Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The solution has a user-friendly interface and is easy to configure."
"The product is very scalable, robust, has an easy setup with a short-duration deployment and good technical support."
"Nakivo offers direct support through the graphical interface and this is great to have if you need quick help."
"NAKIVO Backup & Replication is very easy to use."
"The solution offers reliable copying and fast recovery."
"This is a user-friendly solution that has a lot of certifications and documentation for the Microsoft Hyper-V infrastructure."
"The ability to restore in a catastrophic event is priceless, since every company must use a backup solution of some sort."
"Nakivo's reporting features have helped a lot. They give my boss high visibility into what's going on, which is crucial because we had a data breach in the past where we lost about 12 years of data. That's why we bought several appliances, and we replicate the same backup twice a day to three different depositories."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"The first implementation is a bit difficult but once is up and running is rock solid and extremely easy to manage."
"In terms of what could be improved for the next release, I would probably answer better documentation and licensing models."
"I think it is important to work not only in replicating the virtual machines in Amazon AWS, but in other cloud systems."
"I would like to see some additional models in the next release to make backups more functional."
"The product needs to improve backup speed and replication speed."
"There is a familiar error that pops up and that is a VM error as much as it is a Nakivo error. It says that the job couldn't calm the VM and restores might be impacted. That error is, to say the least, a bit scary. I have seen this type of error on other backup systems also."
"We want the backup job to consume fewer resources, as the utilization is very high if we choose the best compression."
"So far, there is no version that supports Polish. If such a version existed, many customers in our region would decide to purchase and implement this solution."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is ranked 6th in Backup and Recovery with 85 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NAKIVO Backup & Replication writes "Good deduplication, easy to configure, and offers a free version". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas NAKIVO Backup & Replication is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and Zerto. See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.