We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and Veeam Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"Its stability and scalability were the main reasons for going for this solution. It is highly scalable, and its stability is also powerful. It has a friendly interface, and its monitoring and performance are the best in the market."
"Veeam Is very useful for most environments and can scale up in most environments - such as Amazon or Azure."
"A quick-working solution that is very user friendly."
"It's a pretty complete product."
"The most valuable feature is the continuous backup."
"The integration of Veeam Backup Replication is very good."
"I am not a direct user of this product, but my technical guys tell me that they like the product, and it is easy to use. We don't have any issues with it."
"I know it's not exactly a feature, but I accept it works and it's easy to use. With the Veeam Backup & Replication, we have no problems in managing restore. Obviously, the most important thing about backup software. I used to say that every backup software can make backups, but only good ones can make a restore."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"The solution could improve by having more user-friendly dashboards."
"The solution requires a lot of bandwidth."
"It's a great product, but only if you have everything virtualized."
"My main concern about Veeam is that I hope our backups will still be secure in the event of a security incident such as a ransomware attack. In Veeam version 11 they do state that there is ransomware protection, but until it has been proven to be effective, I don't have any assurance that it will prevent data loss."
"The implementation of the features can be improved. Currently, there is no segregation of duty. Normally, any backup software or client service software is implemented in a way where one person is responsible for the implementation of the server, and one is responsible for the client, but Veeam Backup & Replication is not implemented in that way. Therefore, restores don't work like that. The backup guys have to do the restores, which is not a good thing. Its pricing should also be improved. It is quite expensive."
"It could use DR features similar to Zerto."
"The pricing model could be improved. It can be made cheaper."
"Veeam Backup Replication could improve by having better integration with the cloud. Additionally, they do not have direct integration to S3 or Azure storage for the backups of the VMs. This feature would be beneficial because we have to go through the scalable repository which I do not like."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while Veeam Backup & Replication is ranked 1st in Backup and Recovery with 329 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while Veeam Backup & Replication is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup & Replication writes "Beneficial pricing model, user friendly interface, and many free features". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect and NAKIVO Backup & Replication, whereas Veeam Backup & Replication is most compared with Acronis Cyber Protect, Azure Backup, Rubrik, Zerto and Veritas NetBackup. See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. Veeam Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
