We performed a comparison between Jamf Pro and Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."Being able to manage the devices remotely is most valuable. We can push security requirements through Microsoft Intune."
"Its direct integration with all the other products that we have from Microsoft is valuable. We're using the E5 license, and we have a whole wealth of different products available. It just makes it easier to have everything from one provider."
"Among the most valuable features are the Company Portal that is built into Intune, and the update rings so that we can manage what types of future updates the devices get."
"It has improve our organization through the remote management of non-domain joined devices."
"As the solution is a software as a service, the scalability is unlimited."
"The tool's most valuable feature is Autopilot."
"The initial setup is not complex."
"Agile and easy to deploy MDM solution that covers the maximum number of policies. Stable, scalable, and with knowledgeable technical support."
"There is also zero-day support to all new Apple OS."
"I can add policies, configuration profiles, patch management, and smart group membership to one single view, and this is very helpful at a glance."
"It's a great way to keep track of all of our licenses and the software we use daily."
"We have been able to successfully manage applications and inventory within our machines."
"The self-service portal enables standard users to install and update software, change settings, and open organizational URLs."
"The features that have been the most life-saving for us are pre-stage enrollments and self-service."
"The user interface is great."
"From the reviews that we are getting, the feedback from the client, the tool is very good on the Jamf side - especially for the Macs."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"Enhancements for managing MacOS more comprehensively would be beneficial."
"Reporting and troubleshooting for the application deployment could be better. It's very difficult to understand."
"The solution requires Mac support."
"For an existing customer who has an SCCM, it would need to be upgraded to an MECM first before I can introduce Microsoft Intune."
"I expect Microsoft Intune to have more features in the cloud because there are two major functionalities that we need to be added. This is software metering and license management. These functionalities, for now, must be on-premise. For this purpose, we have set up a SQL Server and I hope that in near future this option will be in the cloud in Microsoft Intune."
"The solution could improve its flexibility."
"I'm still playing around with it and haven't had any issues with the product yet, but support can definitely be improved."
"Additional application deployment options e.g. MSI deployment with more complex parameters or additional side-by-side files, and non-MSI deployment options."
"A dark mode would for sure be appreciated."
"For patch management in Jamf, two Smart Groups are required as patch policies cannot be scoped as of now. This is not a major issue, as there is a great workaround by using a wrapped "member of" duplicate Smart Group. However, being able to avoid two Smart Groups for patch management would be nice."
"Jamf should give the option to download individual device policy logs, as this capability would really help to diagnose issues."
"The patching can definitely use a little bit of improvement. They should make it a little bit more automated."
"There's only one thing that I would like to see improved. It's potentially being worked on right now, actually. That is the ability to provide remote support access to use those devices. I'd like it to work in a similar manner to Desktop Central or other solutions like Team Viewer."
"Jamf does not go beyond Apple."
"The solution should offer beta testing for new products."
"I would like to see Jamf add more training tutorials and documentation."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
More Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Jamf Pro is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 105 reviews while Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is ranked 12th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews. Jamf Pro is rated 9.6, while Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Jamf Pro writes "Customizable with a self-service portal and a good security posture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". Jamf Pro is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl, Microsoft Configuration Manager and IBM MaaS360, whereas Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM and ManageEngine Endpoint Central.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.