We performed a comparison between JFrog Xray and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of JFrog Xray is the display of the entire internal dependencies hierarchy."
"JFrog Xray's reporting feature has a lot of options in it, including scanning."
"Good reporting functionalities."
"JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code."
"If multiple dependencies and vulnerabilities are found in a project, JFrog Xray is intelligent enough to tell you which vulnerability to target first."
"I would say that this solution has helped our organization by allowing us to automate a lot of the processes."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"One of the most valuable features of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is its exportability, which allows us to conduct risk assessments efficiently."
"It's a recommended tool for penetration testers because it's effective for that purpose."
"The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"The initial setup is not complex."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is an easy-to-use product. I"
"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."
"Since we have been using the solution via APIs, there are some limitations in the APIs."
"Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore, we require customized reports from the Xray tool."
"JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard."
"Lacks deeper reporting, the ability to compare things."
"JFrog Xray's documentation and error logging could be improved."
"I think that the user interface should be expanded to provide customers with a better dashboard for reviewing their feedback regarding their images and the vulnerabilities that are associated with the images."
"The speed of JFrog Xray should improve. Other solutions have better performance."
"The only drawback of the solution is that it is expensive."
"It can have more integration."
"The solution is a bit slow."
"I would like the solution to cover the whole cycle of mitigation since it's an area where the solution currently lacks."
"It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
JFrog Xray is ranked 17th in Vulnerability Management with 7 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. JFrog Xray is rated 8.2, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JFrog Xray writes "An intelligent solution that prioritizes which vulnerability to target first in your project". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". JFrog Xray is most compared with Black Duck, Snyk, Veracode, Mend.io and Trivy, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our JFrog Xray vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
