We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure App Service and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The primary and standout feature is ease of deployment."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the easy deployment, the scalability, and the Azure maintenance."
"The best feature is scalability, which allows you to target potential clients worldwide by connecting the application to a local server. This makes the application readily accessible, and the response time will be much better."
"The most beneficial aspect of Microsoft Azure App Service is its automated DevOps deployment, which includes configurations that ensure secure connections to key vault and database resources."
"The solution is very simple to set up."
"It allows you to host your App Service on Azure and provides the ability to bypass online."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure App Service are its vertical and horizontal scaling, along with its ability to throw a docker image."
"The feature I find most valuable is the 'Diagnose and Solve problem' function. This not only allows us to fix a problem, but also to generate analytics on why the issue occurred."
"It's a good tool for workflow automation."
"The most valuable features of Pega BPM are low code, no code, functionality, and easy development."
"Pega BPM offers a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities."
"There are a lot of frameworks in the product. I use Pega PRPC the most."
"While Pega technical support is okay, it also depends on the issues you need help with and who your contact is with Pega."
"Pega BPM has a full suite for any enterprise. It is a process orchestration platform. It has detailed features for case management and workflows."
"Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support."
"Allowed us to develop and quickly release with confidence using cloud technologies."
"There is still room for improvement in terms of the maturity of the solution. Everything is available that we need, but the issue is that they are still upgrading. Even though they have Azure applications and automation services, they still need to mature more. There are many things that need to mature and the road map for this is quite long, taking another three to eight years to have a mature solution."
"The solution is somewhat expensive."
"Microsoft Azure App Service has a lot of complexity because there are a lot of options and functionality. It is simple to become confused, there are many technical elements to learn before you can utilize the solution. If they could make the solution easier to use it would be a benefit."
"There are no issues with the solution."
"The configuration is slow without understanding the systematic process."
"It would be fantastic if Microsoft morphed after my exit service, removing it from subscriptions and moving it to different regions, especially for that service."
"Can be improved by increasing the number of data centres worldwide."
"The solution is quite expensive. If you need more features, you need to pay for them."
"The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed."
"From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"Business specific functionality is needed."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
"I would like to see Pega BPM improve the user experience."
"They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help."
"The UI part needs improvement."
Microsoft Azure App Service is ranked 8th in Rapid Application Development Software with 38 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 57 reviews. Microsoft Azure App Service is rated 8.4, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure App Service writes "A solution with great server management and helps improve performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". Microsoft Azure App Service is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Appian and ServiceNow Now Platform, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and Bizagi. See our Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.