We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."Active Directory is a good feature. The infrastructure features that Azure provides are also good."
"It's a cloud service, so it's always up to date."
"The solution is easy to manage within the cloud application, has good performance, and is secure."
"Feedback and error messages make much more sense in Azure than in AWS."
"The integration with Databricks is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"Great features at a good price."
"It is quick and easy to deploy. It is flexible, and we can deploy a resource anytime. We like and prefer the pay-as-you-go model."
"Azure has the best website amongst all cloud computing platforms. It is simple to utilize, and one can release nearly anything, from app services to host sites."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring because it's very useful for checking and troubleshooting compared with other products, like Nagios for example, that have some interaction with Oracle."
"We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"SQL Tuning Advisor, ADDM, Top Activity, ASM Space Manager, Incident Notifications"
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool."
"This solution allows us to quickly drill down when there are issues."
"It's easy to implement as it's made by Oracle for Oracle."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager is a scalable solution."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"The solution should emulate what MuleSoft is doing. At the moment MuleSoft has a lot of other features compared to Azure API integration."
"Sometimes performance takes a hit on a slow network."
"It would be beneficial if Microsoft could enhance the free version to allow for more exploration and development. That's my only suggestion regarding Azure."
"Some of the capabilities available in an on-premise SQL Server aren't available in Azure. For instance, we found Azure Managed Instance to be lacking in certain aspects. One of our clients decided to stay on-premise rather than migrate to Azure because of this reason."
"Technical support needs improvement."
"Dashboards and reporting could be improved."
"The solution needs a more integrated password feature."
"There should be be better support for microservices and containers."
"The solution's agents work with Java, and the Java code sometimes consumes a lot of memory on the CPU."
"Technical support could be faster."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager six out of 10 for affordability. It's expensive."
"RMAN tools need improvement."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"In my opinion, rather than a younger DBA, think the user interface could be improved."
"The product must improve its support team."
"The tool's pricing is costly."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 299 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.