We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence and Palo Alto Networks VM-Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very scalable. There are approximately 2,000 endpoints and up to 200 servers in our company."
"The solution is well integrated with other Microsoft security products."
"It just runs in the background. I don't have to worry about, making sure it's Intelligence. So, you know, this kind of makes it very easy, have to worry about installing. It is easy to use."
"Microsoft's integration into the security stack works quite well."
"The global review and remediation of malicious code is probably the most valuable feature."
"The product provides efficient email security for sending links and file attachments."
"Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence assesses machines for vulnerabilities and gives remediations."
"The solution blocks incoming threats on the local PC or any cloud-based threats."
"It offers a single pane of glass for all the different types of installations."
"It is nice to have a rock solid security platform that we can count on."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the zero-trust security architecture."
"In terms of security breaches, the product aids in categorizing and monitoring traffic, allowing for the identification of potentially malicisous or incorrectly formatted applications."
"In the newer version, there are 3850s, all of them are scalable. They fit better into the medium or small businesses."
"It has a good performance which helps you with the stability of your virtual environment."
"The most valuable features are web control and IPS/IDS."
"Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is very easy to use."
"I would like to see more integration with other solutions. For example, integration well with Microsoft but not with other solutions."
"The price could be improved."
"One area that can be improved is reducing false positives."
"One area where Microsoft Defender could be improved is in its support for non-Microsoft products, particularly for systems running Linux or other open-source platforms across ecosystems."
"The stability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"A stable licensing model is absent"
"The tool's onboarding of users that use on-premise or hybrid environments needs to be improved."
"I would like for there to be extra confirmation that there aren't viruses. Even if the virus detection software is always running there could be hidden applications that are using the computer."
"We have run into some issues with scaling and limitations associated with some of the configurations."
"The tool is very costly."
"There is no proper support channel to follow up on cases."
"In the next release, I would like to see better integration of multi-factor authentication vendors."
"It has to be more scalable for the deployment of VMs on the cloud."
"With Palo Alto Networks VM-Series, it is hard for me to manage its network configuration part."
"The current licensing model can be a sore point as we're paying for features we're not fully utilizing."
"The solution's licensing could be improved, and training should be included before installation."
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is ranked 15th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 27 reviews while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is ranked 10th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 53 reviews. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is rated 8.4, while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence writes "A tool that offers endpoint protection with low maintenance costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series writes "Many features are optimized for troubleshooting real-time scenarios, saving a lot of time". Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, STAXX, Cisco Threat Grid, VirusTotal and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), whereas Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is most compared with Azure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate-VM, Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Secure Firewall and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. See our Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.